• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Why are there no 5 String Explorer style basses?>

Last edited:
A little out of the price range.
$_1.jpeg
 
Somebunny had a 5 string fretless on my local CL for the longest time…

the price kept getting lower and lower and the listing either expired or it got sold.

I liked the fretless part of it but not the 5 string part.
 
Apparently there are some 5 stringer's of that general variety. I will add that a 4 string Explorer is a poor ergonomic design for a bass - inherent neck dive and excessive reach. A 5 string adds mass to the neck, an extra tuner, and a B string (that weighs more than any other string). So, it adds even more neck dive to an already neck heavy design. Not a recipe for success.
 
Apparently there are some 5 stringer's of that general variety. I will add that a 4 string Explorer is a poor ergonomic design for a bass - inherent neck dive and excessive reach. A 5 string adds mass to the neck, an extra tuner, and a B string (that weighs more than any other string). So, it adds even more neck dive to an already neck heavy design. Not a recipe for success.

If you’re talking “explorers” that are more like T-birds then I agree with you. A true explorer shape tends to have a much larger body “fin” which adds weight and shifts the center of gravity drastically from my experience (I used to own and aria pro zzb). My bass actually had a little neck rise (liked to sit at about a 30-45 degree neck up angle). YMMV.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Iristone