Obviously plenty of options for high-end boutique jazz and precision basses but none for music man basses. Why?
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Warwick FNAObviously plenty of options for high-end boutique jazz and precision basses but none for music man basses. Why?
Invalid Link RemovedI actually don't see many cheapo knockoffs at all
Hm, interesting that those are only available in the Great White North. Maybe whatever patent/trade dress etc laws MM's legal team uses to protect their designs only apply in the US?Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
Could be true.Hm, interesting that those are only available in the Great White North. Maybe whatever patent/trade dress etc laws MM's legal team uses to protect their designs only apply in the US?
Obviously plenty of options for high-end boutique jazz and precision basses but none for music man basses. Why?
Maybe because it is extremely easy (and even necessary) to improve upon the Fender versions of the J and P, whereas the Stingray and Sterling were basically created perfect.![]()
Aslin Dane?@/\/\3phist0 I actually don't see many cheapo knockoffs at all.
I have to agree. Even though my new sr5 hasn't changed much as far as design compared to the one I had a decade ago. It's a great bass with better sounding electronics than the majority of more modern basses. Fenders on the other hand are the basses everyone mods anyways. So I think companies saw how many people buy fenders and swap the electronics and stuff and were like hey we can do that and charge a lot more.
Yeah. I had my '91 SR5 for over two decades, and it was just as current and a$$kicking the day I (foolishly) let it go as it was the day I bought it.