• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Why do guitarists get all the cool looking gear?

I feel the pain. I really dig vintage gear, and I do think we got the short end of the stick, but it's mostly about numbers. Because we need more watts, bass amp design has turned to much more of an engineering feat than pure aesthetics.

Case in point: I love my little GK MB150 in all of it's tiny solid state goodness - but the thing looks like R2D2... it's ugly. What I'd really want is the bass version of this:
http://www.swartamps.com/swart_atomic_space_tone.htm
Cute little tweeded out thing, all tube, and can fully compete in a band setting and sounds badass. When that comes out for bass players - sign me up!

yeah the swart AST or a daab tupelo honey would be killer... maybe i should think about a genz benz shuttle rehoused in a vintage style head... over some nice tweed aguliar cabs... mmmmm
 
i happen to think the pro line of GK looks good....its a good mix of form and functionality.....like a mullet....business in the front, party in the back...but you can tweak that to your liking

I hate to rag on someones thing, but this kind of talk needs to be stamped out, MULLETS ARE NOT COOL OR SOCIALLY ACCEPTABLE IN ANY FORM. EVER. sorry for yellin
 
i happen to think the pro line of GK looks good....its a good mix of form and functionality.....like a mullet....business in the front, party in the back...but you can tweak that to your liking

:eyebrow:

Never, ever compare GK to a mullet, ever again.

It's just wrong. Plain wrong. :p

Now I've got an image of a trailer, a can of Budweiser, and a drunk guy with a trucker hat and a GK T-shirt stuck in my head. :bawl:

(For the record, I'm just ribbing you, but I still fail to grasp how GK could ever be even remotely analogous to a mullet... different strokes for different folks, I guess :hmm:)
 
Ever seen a bass that looked like this that played worth a damn?.

Invalid Link Removed

....Me either.

I have... :cool:

But you guys have it all wrong, bassists have the best looking Vintage-styled amps.

40a1580d22b2a192ca84a2c81f8961b9.jpg
 
I thought Orange amps were originally used on both bass and guitar? Anyhow, NO WAY do guitarists have a wider variety of designs. If you look at guitars, there are very few body shapes, and they are mild in design. The most original part is the headstock that identifies the brand. With bass guitars, the body shapes are often as branded as the headstock shape. The designs range from mild to extreme, from paint to intricate natural wood patterns (coffee table?). Bass amps also come in wider ranges of designs. I get the picture that some don't like the new markbass design, but I think it's simply that yellow isn't anyone's favorite color. Personally I think it's a sharp design for the most part that will lead people to purchase more markbass brand products to make a matching set instead of mixing and matching brands.
 
Yeah, they were. Matamps are either/or amplifiers, but it's been a long time since the days of the original Orange Matamps.

and as for Markbass's design, I agree heavily with whoever said that they look like Power Tools...
(Markbass gets away from Guitar Center, signs exclusive distribution with... Home Depot?!)
 
No no no! This isn't supposed to be a guitarist or gear bashing thread!

What I should have said was - why do you think Guitarists get a much wider variety of gear styles than Bass players?

Because on average they spend two to three times as much on their gear AND there are a lot more of them.

We need to start requiring ALL new bands to have at least two bass players. Three would be "perfect bass" (pardon the pun! :smug:) Lead bassist, rhythm bassist and bass bassist! :cool:
 

Latest posts