TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Three words.I'm sure this was discussed here before but I was wondering what attracts you all to buy the older Fender Basses 50s- 70s ...is it the look, the feel or the sound? for me it is all of the above and i love the thick necks esp on the older precisions...![]()
I posted this in one of the earlier threads, but it bears repeating here:
From a hardware standpoint, I would agree any mid priced modern bass is vastly superior to my 63 P Bass. The fretwork on my 63 (which has original frets owing to a lifetime of flatwounds) is passable, but it is not on par with most modern basses. The big advantage to a vintage instrument, in my opinion, is the wood. My 63's body is a lightweight resonant old growth alder and the neck is straight-grained maple with a Brazilian rosewood fingerboard. Those woods are virtually impossible to obtain today, especially with the benefit of fifty years of aging. Wood is the one reason why old instruments will always be special.
I have a '77 Fender Jazz that I've been in love with since I first saw the Craigslist ad. It has a degree of subtlety and a wide, wide range of tone and feel that just doesn't seem to happen with a newer bass. I can dig in on it and get it to do things that wouldn't work on a modern bass. It sits in the mix effortlessly without turning to mud. It's heavy but it feels solid and well-crafted in a way that I haven't seen on the newer Fenders. The neck is perfect. If selling it were my last source of income, I would rather starve and go bankrupt.![]()