• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Why do you play fours?

I played sixes exclusively for years and years. Then I tried a 4 one day and immediately realized I was able to comprehend the neck better and faster, which allowed me to play more freely.

Switched back to four and never looked back. Break out a five or six once in a while when a recording calls for it.
 
Hmmm.... off the top of my head:
  1. I own many more 4s than 5s.
  2. They're less expensive.
  3. I've been playing 4s for decades and they feel much more comfortable.
  4. I play lots of drop D songs, and they're generally easier on a 4 than 5.
  5. It's next to impossible to throw a D-tuner on a 5, for those drop tunings.
  6. You only really get 5 extra notes, and if playing in drop D on a 4, then 3.
  7. I have no need to play anything I play near the nut, on the upper half of the neck.
  8. 4 string basses are lighter.
  9. Strings cost less.
  10. There is far more variety in bass choices for 4 strings.
  11. I think 4 strings look cooler than 5s, but that's just my opinion.
  12. I have one less string to think about.
  13. I like hitting and slapping my strings, especially the E string, and the extra B cramps my style.
  14. B gets in the way when I'm pounding away with a pick to 8th notes on an E or A punkish tune.
  15. Being used to a 4 all my life makes it easy to make stupid mistakes with a 5.
  16. I think the 5th string is unnecessary. Look at all the great music that was created without it.
  17. I'm not a big fan of notes below the low E. They start getting muddled.
  18. There seems, to me, to be something snobbish about playing a 5 string.
  19. I believe there is some prejudice toward 5 string players. Some rock bands won't have it, period.
  20. They don't make many 5 string short scales, and thems are the basses I'm currently getting into.
  21. Finding a good tight B string is a challenge.
  22. B strings take extra fiddling on amps to make them fart-less.
  23. I'm in love with pretty much all my 4 strings.
  24. Because nothing I play NEEDS a 5 string.
  25. Because I can and don't want to play a 5 string.
 
But seriously, I have four string rics and a P, and five strings Jazz, Zon and Warwick basses. Each has their distinct tone and purpose.

I do not see the point in this discussion. Play whatever you like.
 
I've had 6s and 5s before, the fives both B-G and E-C. I just don't like them. I can tolerate my SS tuned E-C. I didn't like how I sounded when I fully incorporated the B as it's designed to be used, and it seemed pointless to just play the songs I already knew the same way only with an extra string to keep silent. I don't play much metal or gospel or modern country so I don't encounter songs designed for a low B. Being a SS player the extra ergonomics of using a 5 as a way to minimize stretching and shifting is really N/A as well.

FOR ME, a 5 string is a solution to a problem I don't have. Mileage varies of course.
 
The idea for this thread was spurred by curiosity. There are so many options to choose from these days. There is a thread posing the question of why you play more than four - this is not that thread.

I want to know why you play a standard four-string bass. That's it!

My reasons:
*It's comfortable.
*I enjoy the "classic" aesthetic of a four-string, Leo Fender-designed electric bass.
*Less is more (subjective!!)

Let's hear it.
I guess the above apply (less the aesthetic thing or some sort of philosophical "4 is best" attitude).

I have four basses that I love and have owned for between 10 and 25 years. They're all 4 string basses. Personally I've never felt a compelling need to add the additional string and never been in a playing situation where it particularly hampered me not to have the low B-Eb available. Given that I would need to readjust my playing significantly for, what for me would be, little or no perceived gain... what's the point. I'm happy with my 4 string basses.

It's certainly not some sort of "Well it was OK for [Jaco/Duck/Jamerson/add preferred bass player here]" thing. That's just daft talk.

I'm just happy with my 4 string basses.

Simple as...
 
  • Like
Reactions: twinjet
There is an aesthetic consideration. A 5 string would not get me more gigs, it would cost me gigs. Just don’t see em much in my world. Had a USA Lakland 5 through an endorsement deal a long time ago. It was a fine bass that never got played. Another endorser sent me a 6 (that I didn’t ask for) and the high C was kinda fun. The Low B on that bass sounded terrible. Floppy and awful. These days I have a 35” scale 4 string in case a gig calls for lower tunings. Never does though. I’ve currently got it tuned to C# standard for writing new material. We’ll see how that goes. If I played P&W I’d probably own a 5. All them big pads they use in that music.
 
  • Like
Reactions: inanimate_carb
The idea for this thread was spurred by curiosity. There are so many options to choose from these days. There is a thread posing the question of why you play more than four - this is not that thread.

I want to know why you play a standard four-string bass. That's it!

My reasons:
*It's comfortable.
*I enjoy the "classic" aesthetic of a four-string, Leo Fender-designed electric bass.
*Less is more (subjective!!)

Let's hear it.
You have more selection with 4 strings and a lot of 5 strings have horrible huge necks. My Cirrus 5 has a great neck. You have to look around.