I play for myself, ever since I was a teenager I wanted to play the bass but due to my living circumstances I was unable to do so. Now I got a bass as a gift from my then fiancee and the rest as they say, is history 
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I'd say that was the primary motivation for me, and my entire musical network and peers for most of my life. I'd rather an accomplished professional take notice in something I've played and acknowledge it, than a crowd of 5000 (which I've played many times). I play in bands, including a lowly bar cover band, and there is admiration from the laity, while that mental mechanism is deep in my mind, at work at all times, as if a professional may walk in the room or crowd at any time, and I want to measure up.in fact some musicians sometimes give the impression that they play music mainly for the specific purpose of impressing other musicians. This whole side of music-making is something which I’ve always found incomprehensible."

It's a great question. I was inspired to play by bassists that were central to their band, and had a unique, recognizable voice. My goal was never to emulate one of those voices, or even to try to learn how to play like them, but instead to become a musician/creator in the "spirit" of those cats. I will never be as great as any of them, but what I can (perhaps) achieve, is some sort of new or different contribution to the art universe, even if it's just a little tiny variation. Not sure I've achieve that yet, but that's what I go for. Something new, good, different that somebody besides me will enjoy. Each new idea is an opportunity to do that. Those opportunities excite me. I play because I enjoy it. I enjoy composing and hearing the finished project. But I'm also a miner, looking for that magic gem of an ideaDon't know where else to put this. A friend who is heavily into avant-garde music sent me this interview with an avant-garde bassist, Simon Fell. A couple of his comments struck me as likely to cause a few heads to explode:
"...I’ve never really thought of myself as a bass player in a specialised "city & guilds" way – i.e. excessively interested (if not obsessed) with the mechanics of basses and their construction, technical questions, the theory and history of bass lines etc. Essentially, I’m simply interested in all musical questions, all instruments and their potential – I just happen to (mainly) play the double bass. For me technique (on any instrument) is simply a means to an end, i.e. the realisation of something musically worthwhile. The kind of musicians I feel little connection with are those (and there are many) who seem to see music as a potential way of demonstrating technique. Such musicians are often incredibly impressed by other people demonstrating their technique (rather than making interesting music); in fact some musicians sometimes give the impression that they play music mainly for the specific purpose of impressing other musicians. This whole side of music-making is something which I’ve always found incomprehensible."
As for myself, I enjoy listening to players who have great facility on the instrument; I'm never going to be one of them, and it doesn't seem to matter, anyway. Whatever it is I'm doing when I'm playing, people are entertained enough by it to actually pay me to do it. [Insert Gallic shrug]
i don't think the quote is earthshaking/blasphemous. big whup.