This is EXACTLY why some of the people I know refuse to communicate via email or text or IM. Because things get taken out of context, sarcasm isn't always recognized, and you can't immediately reply or correct yourself as quickly.
I never said "If you don't play a Fender you suck". Or, "Brand X is a piece of sh*t, if you play that you're gay". I like variety. Scratch that, LOVE it. Ok, I own 4 Fenders. A Jazz, a P, a PJ, and a sort of Marcus Miller clone. Do I want to own some others? Hell yes. I'm currently looking to get a Stingray 5. I also went to go look at an old Rick, but didn't buy it only because the guy beat it to death and needed too much work.
Whether or not you think something is "ugly" is totally a matter of personal taste. Everyone has their own tastes. I hate broccoli. My girl loves it. Does that make either one of us an "idiot"? No, just means we like different things. Some guys think Paris Hilton is gorgeous. I think she's a skank. Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
Remember that joke I told earlier? That friend of mine is also a bass player, and his main basses are an Ibanez and a Spector. He loves them, and I think they're cool. However, he told me that as much as he likes to play them live and in rehearsal, he borrowed a Fender Jazz to record. Why? Because his others just didn't sound right. Were they bad? No. Just didn't fit in the mix.
When I said you're most likely not a pro, what I meant was that when you go out and do sessions and live shows, as a hired hand, you need to have the tools your employer wants you to have. Someone said earlier that he saw ads with equipment requirements. I see that A LOT out here. Not just for bass. Certain instruments just don't fit the sound or look of certain music. Imagine a Green Day or Blink 182 type band with the bass player playing a six string Alembic. That would not only not sound right, it would look ridiculous! Not because the bass per se isn't cool, it just doesn't fit. Did it look cool when Entwistle played one? Hell yes it did. (he played a 4 though i think)
Drums are my first instrument, and I remember many times certain bands wanted a certain look or sound. For the most part, you're either a "Bonham" or a "Neal". A "Bonham" is a 4 or 5 piece kit with larger sized drums, single kick, and stripped down accessories. Travis Barker is a "Bonham". A "Neal", is a large, multi-tom, double kick kit with lots of bells and whistles. Carter Beauford is a "Neal". Both those guys are great IMO, but just imagine if they switched bands? It would be extremely lame.
It's the same thing as bands wanting you to have a certain haircut, clothes, etc. You have to fit the sound AND the image. And in most groups of today, it looks like they spend more time on their tattoos than they do on their music. Is that a good thing? IMO, NO. But that's the way it is.
P.S. I'm not "closed minded". I'm a realist. A pragmatist. I deal with "what is" not "what should be".
