• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Why don't bass amps have reverb?

Reverb effects the higher mid frequencies so it is good for guitar that sits in that region. Most manufacturers probably feel that for bass, it would be best to provide it with an outboard device for those that want it rather than make it a feature that everyone will pay for.

I'm more of a fan of echo rather than reverb. Fender makes a nice tube based stand alone reverb unit. The Roland Space Echo is great, as is the El Capistan pedal. My point is, ther are a lot of alternatives that can do it a lot better than a built in reverb.
 
You can't argue with a touch of reverb though as the O'Jays had in the mix in For the Love of Money. How often would you want it use it though.

If you listen though, the reverb is taken off for most of the tune. Plus he's playing with a pick which helps with note attack. When the bass is exposed, reverb can be a cool effect. Once you add other instruments into the mix, it can become problematic. Reverb is taking away attack and definition (by design), and with low frequencies that leans towards mud and/or disappearing in the mix.

I use delay a fair amount but that is usually for doubling/call-response. I've used reverb in the studio as an effect and to tie instruments together into the same "room", but live I'd only end up using it for solo/duet or really open parts. But ymmv.
 
Bass heads avoid reverb to save $$$ IMO. In a studio setting, the engineer/producer usually wants complete control over what gets wetted with reverb or other effects.

I use reverb when the song calls for it OR if I need to add more "space" in a dead place when we're doing 3 piece songs. Then you have the occasional song where the bass was recorded with reverb(arena rock bands). We don't cover this song featuring the late Scott Smith but doing a play-along with reverb added to your bass gives you the exact tone.


In headphones, reverb is very fun to play with to hear what a lonely bass sounds like in a large room or auditorium.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: jj4001 and soktau
If you listen though, the reverb is taken off for most of the tune. Plus he's playing with a pick which helps with note attack. When the bass is exposed, reverb can be a cool effect. Once you add other instruments into the mix, it can become problematic. Reverb is taking away attack and definition (by design), and with low frequencies that leans towards mud and/or disappearing in the mix.

I use delay a fair amount but that is usually for doubling/call-response. I've used reverb in the studio as an effect and to tie instruments together into the same "room", but live I'd only end up using it for solo/duet or really open parts. But ymmv.

I feel the same. A solo'ed bass can have an effect to thicken the sound but it has to have its place in the mix. Even active basses, alone they are fine, but they can have difficulty finding a place in the mix. A double bass can have echo on it in the right context. But it has to be used judiciously.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tom Bomb
In a live setting, I have rarely used reverb as it can easily clutter up a stage and house mix and needs a LOT of dialing in to get right based on the room and what the rest of the band is playing at the time you're using it.

At home is a completely different story! Especially if you're running your signal through a headphone/studio rig, a carefully tailored reverb signal can really add a lot of ambient "air" and life to an otherwise dry mix.

Lonnybass