From the OP: "MIM Fenders are rip offs by using company's respected name,..."
Wha? WTH?
Absurd.
Wha? WTH?
Absurd.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
In '99 I purchased a '57 Stratocaster that was made in Mexico. It very closely duplicated the lines, logo, body shape and bouts, v-neck and overall dimensions. When compared to my friend's real '57, it was a spot-on match except for being a few pounds heavier, and not quite having that 62 year old sound some from that era have. Overall tho', I still have it. I gigged it for 3 years and never found fault with it. Its finish is solid and the only mods were having the PU's dipped and the routing shielded as they duplicated the '57 all the way to the nth degree. Tone-wise & playability is nice. The nut is bone as well.So, I bought a Mexican Standard Tele for my son and what a great guitar. Great sounding and quality. I took it in to our guitar shop we trade with on the regular to have the strings changed and a new bone nut. Well, surprise to us, the nut from the factory was bone. I don't know what else on the guitar is different from a standard mexi, but that was a nice surprise. Good quality, good player.
Have any of you experienced this before? A bone nut on a mexi from the factory?
Like I said, I just don't see that same value/dollar ratio that they used to have. When I could pickup a brand new MIM for only a hundred or so more than the Squier counterpart and Asian instruments weren't nearly as well built I thought they were the bee's knees. It'd take a hell of a force of nature to separate me from my current MIM basses, but I'm probably never going to go out of my way to get one again. Like I said, it was just my few cents. I even find the current offset models to be a bit humdrum, all though they are kind of cool looking. A current basic model MIM sells for $500. For around that same price you get get into the G&L Tributes, Sterling Rays, Ibanez Soundgears and Talmans. All of which has better components to them than the MIM basic models. I love my MIMs and if I find one I love and can justify, I'd get another. But, I'm not going to actively search one out anymore. Next time I buy something with a "Fender" on its headstock, it'll either be vintage or a high end American model.I disagree with most of this post. I think the recent offerings from Fender across the board, especially the most recent models are very good quality and a good value top to bottom. I also think they are relatively better than whatever Fender was offering at any time during the '90s, again across the board (MIM or MIA) IMHO, YMMV and all that gobbledeygook.
I am a big Lakland Skyline fan and do agree that they are great examples of the stuff coming out of Asia along with others mentioned. But I don't see them as superior to the Fender stuff, just different. I prefer my Lakland Indo 5 strings over anything Fender has in a 5er, but that has more to do with design than quality or value.
I was within feet of buying that EXACT bass. She is a sweet, sweet beauty!View attachment 3189457 Never been A huge fan of the standard MIM line but beyond that liked many models, i am really A big Japanese bass fan. That said these are some great basses I've played 3 and all were nice and of course MIM
Mine had perfect fret ends, took some truss tweaking and set up with great low action, no dead spots and a killer tone. I easily rank mine's playability and tone in line with all of my MIM fenders I've had the pleasure to know.Don't know what to say to this. I have a Sterling SUB. It was used, but never played. $200. It's a test bed for me, nothing more. The fretends on mine were awful. It took 90 minutes of filing to make it playable. Once fixed and set up, it's a decent, cheap bass. It is no where near the quality of my three MIM Fenders. Anyone who thinks it is is delusional and I've got a bridge in Brooklyn I'll be happy to sell them.
90s MIM pickups were pretty bad. They weren't reverse wind/ polarity on the J, and buzz was endemic.
My question is, when is it worth it to opt for an American vs MIM?
When trying to decide between a brand new MIM Fender for $600 vs an American Fender that is nearly 20 years old for $800, is the extra $200 worth it for the older American-made model (assuming it's in good condition)? Or would that extra money be better spent on a compressor or preamp?
To a point.....i setup and fine tune all of my guitars myself, often change pickups etc.Yes for the quality is night and day from the MIA. I played both side by side and every single time I can hear the difference.
Provided you buy a used USA....all guitars take a hit when purchased new...some more than others obviously.Maybe you should play both if you can. I think that the MIA is most likely a better money investment.
Hi to all (some years from last time i posted).
As a nonprofessional user, i already bought a sonic red Player Jazz Bass, the recent MIM series that replaced the Standard basses. I know it has new alnico pickups and i tested it with a Standard one, and found a noticeable difference. Some other impressions?