I've been thinking about this for a while, and I think there's an important aspect missing from this argument.
+ Cooperative
- Not Cooperative
To someone who wants something that makes musical and professional sense to me, I'm the first guy.
To the one who wants me to do my job in a way that I think is wrong, I'm the second guy.
+ Professional
(- Not Professional)
To someone whose sense of quality and professionalism is similar to mine, I'm the first guy.
To someone with different ideas about what's professional, I'm the second guy.
+ Respects the culture
- Wants to take over the band
When things are going well, I'm the first guy.
When the wheels are coming off and I can contribute to getting us through the gig successfully, and especially where the leader is insecure about himself, I'm the second guy.
+ Good Interpersonal Skills
- Entitled Attitude
To someone who respects me and my skills, I'm the first guy.
To someone who doesn't, I'm the second.
(+ Happy to get whatever)
- Too Expensive
To those who respect themselves and understand that we are in charge of the value of our work, I'm the first guy.
To those who don't, I'm the second.
My point here is that
one's evaluation of another's behavior depends on one's values and expectations, and those are necessarily completely subjective. If your sense of quality allows you to accept things that mine does not, to you I'm a snob and to me you're a slob. The only objectively correct place to be in a band is in roughly the same place that the leader is subjectively, and if I don't think I can do that, I don't take the gig.
When I'm leading I try to hire people that I'm confident will respect my role, listen and contribute according to their own lights. I try to allow them to be who they are, because that's what makes them attractive as players in the first place. If I need a showman, I can shift the material if he's not that good at technical skills. If I need a technician, I can be more tolerant of weak social skills. The real trick to leading is making the most of the people you have. If you select musicians for compliance, in my experience you're betting long on dumb luck and headed for musical mediocrity.
The thing to do is know your people, and communicate your values, expectations and limits clearly and openly, up front. Don't expect someone else to 'just know' what you want —
your ideas are your own interpretations of what's 'right.' What's 'normal' depends entirely on the context, and reference to 'standard practice' is mental shorthand for the practice you like.