TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Often as a consumer, I do feel there is too much choice, and kinda-sorta agree with Barry Schwartz's "Invalid Link Removed" speech....
..but when I come here, and see how everyone has mashed up a P into something or other... I have to think Fender is catering to the crowd that wants mods, but doesn't want to do (or pay someone to do) them.
They know they are losing money everytime someone mods their gear, so why not just offer it that way? Same with Squier, why not get that entry level cash, instead of giving it away to someone else?
I don't see an issue.
I really don't think that much thought goes in to it. Have you ever worked in management for a corporation? We all assume that corporations base decisions on all kinds on sophisticated scientific data, but in reality, decisions are often made on a whim by managing egomaniacs with little or no objective analysis or consideration.
Because Steve Jobs went back to Apple instead of Fender.Seriously though Jobs would have had higher ups at Fender tarred and feathered for all of the product confusion and overlap.
As someone who hasn't owned or played too many Fender Ps, I have to ask - do all the passive 4 string P's with no bridge pickup really sound different from each other? Or is it just the illusion of choice?
As someone who hasn't owned or played too many Fender Ps, I have to ask - do all the passive 4 string P's with no bridge pickup really sound different from each other? Or is it just the illusion of choice?
THIS RIGHT HERE.Because Steve Jobs went back to Apple instead of Fender.Seriously though Jobs would have had higher ups at Fender tarred and feathered for all of the product confusion and overlap.

Now there's all these model choices but you can't even get the color you want unless you go Custom Shop![]()