Daddy, I want a pony....Ponies are for spoiled little girls. The precision bass is a Clydesdale, not a pony. Clydesdales do not do tricks.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Damnit, I said to myself to sit on my hands, but "the first time"? The P bass everyone knows and loves today is based upon the 1957 one, which is arguably the third design iteration, is it not? If it was right the first time, then everyone would be playing P basses which resemble the original 1951 model, and we'd all have chafed forearms.
File under somewhat pedantic "just sayin'"...![]()
I usually never respond to this recurring thread. I'm sure there will be another one tomorrow and the next day. However, for fun, I'll finally chime in about a brief experience I had.
I have a lot of nice basses, all MIA. Stingrays, Sterlings, Jazz, USA Laklands, etc., all of which I have practiced and gigged with. Bandmates never really took interest - they just heard bass. I was never a big P-Bass believer and I definitely prefer 1.5" at the nut. Anyway, I finally got an MIA P-Bass and nonchalantly brought it to rehearsal. Practice started. It was the first time my bandmates (probably in any band) -- completely unsolicited -- actually lifted their heads up and said "holycow that bass sounds absolutely perfect!" I did not expect this at all and was really surprised they took notice. To me, the P sounded duller and less dynamic than my other bases, but to everyone else, who never otherwise seemed to be interested in my tone, the "sweet spot" hit them in the gut. I started to "get it" more after that.
To address the neck width issue (and my desire to have MIA basses), I got a MIA P with a J neck through the Fender American Design Experience and a Lakland USA Glaub with a Joe Osborn neck.
All that said, I strongly disagree that you need a P to record or that worthy sound engineers have trouble recording other basses. I've used plenty of other active and passive basses to record and they all sound good with a capable engineer.
"I came here for an argument!"Why do you folks keep answering these posts?
It is important to refute this nonsense so that beginning players don't buy into it.Why do you folks keep answering these posts?
I dont have anything against people who post "bland" questions that are asked over and over again and easily searchable "in the right hands." I just chalk them up to being as "non-versatile" as the P basses they question.I have nothing against precision bass guitars, they can play very good in the right hands. They aren't anything crazy though. I always felt like they have a very bland tone. They don't have much versitility either. I much prefer the depth and range of a jazz for example. Im just curious about everyone else's thoughts on this.
Sounds like I feel the reverse of a few of you - I like the P for solo and trio stuff, but prefer the J for when there's more than one guitar. Different strokes for different folks I 'spose.
Why do you folks keep answering these posts?
Excellent question. Maybe it's because telling someone to 'do a search first' has grown out of fashion on these pages. And telling a member to do a search after the fact does little good, anyways. The damage is already done.
M. M.![]()
Bass playing Alembic
Boat oar: Alembic
Cricket Paddle: Alembic
Tent stake.....