mstott25 said:No man, all the mojo is in older, roadworn, authentic breasts that have been manhandled for the past 50 years.
Ha ha! Awesome! :-D
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
mstott25 said:No man, all the mojo is in older, roadworn, authentic breasts that have been manhandled for the past 50 years.
I also wanted to point out that Mojo is not a tangible quality that can be verified, experienced, tested or proven.
I've used the term myself but by doing so was always implying there was something special about an instrument that really appealed to me on some level. To say that a vintage instrument has more "mojo" than a Roadworn can be easily countered by pointing out that a Roadworn has more "charm" or "innocence" or "coyness" than a vintage instrument. In other words, it's a nonsensical statement.
No man, all the mojo is in older, roadworn, authentic breasts that have been manhandled for the past 50 years.
No I am not the original, and no it is not the same as picking up RW instrument.
There is a certain character of this bass that can't be duplicated in a RW. Hard to explain unless you actually play it, but 39 years of hard playing on this bass, even though not from my hands has still made this bass something special to play. It plays like butter and sounds just as good. I have allot of respect for this bass and the person(s) that owned in it before me. There was some series playing done on this puppy. And it is not about the looks, all though I would be lying if I did not say it think it looks cool! But you just don't get that in a RW.
I feel the same about my other 1972 Jazz, and that bass looks almost as good as the day it was made.
![]()
Even though it is a refin and does not have the battle scars of my Sunburst, it still has a certain character being 39 years old that you can't duplicate in the RW.
I look at it like....you can get a Shelby Cobra replica. Sure it will most likely be a awesome car and drives great. But it is still a fake and does not have the character that a real Shelby Cobra has.
MikeBass said:And if a woman has fake breasts, no matter what she tells herself or anyone else for that matter- "I did it to help my self-esteem" crap blah blah blah......she did it for us guys. Period.
And I thank her. A lot!![]()
Although I have heard the bass itself is a goody, I agree that buying a factory road worn just seems phony to me. Also it's kinda funny spending the pretty penny on a new bass that looks old.
Finding a regular MIM under 8 lbs is a thing of beauty. With the Roadworn series, under 8 lbs is the norm. The necks on the Roadworn series are not 9.5" radius, they are 7.25 with a chunkier feel, they are nice. Very nice. So if you like how a Roadworn plays and sounds, you're going to have to get a Roadworn.
All of this conjecture on the moral, societal, ethical and "inaccurate" properties of owning/playing a Roadworn bass are nothing more than a mirror of that person's perspective on what's important and what is not.
Basses are not people (obviously), they are made by people and Roadworns are specifically made by Fender in order to make a profit. So I find it a little silly to apply all of these anthropomorphisms to a bass guitar.
By somebody saying Roadworn basses are wrong/dishonest/inauthentic et al and then list any number of reasons in support of that, they are only communicating their personal views and priorities. Maybe you would feel fake by playing one, or you feel like you're cheating, or you feel like your work ethic is somehow violated...but guess what? It isn't! From reading through this entire thread, it's pretty clear that all of the value attributed to an actual older bass and to have such strong opinions against roadworns is really operating on a more pretentious level than those who don't care.
I don't really care what a bass looks like, if it plays and sounds incredible I'm probably going to pull out the checkbook but of course there are limits. We all have aesthetic preferences, but I've never once found myself having problems enjoying music because I had some sort of disagreement with the instrument being used. I also don't care what any Tom, Dick or Harry off the street thinks about my bass. I don't care if somebody thinks it's old or new or ugly, I'm not a model showing my new line of electric bass wear (on the other hand, I'm much more sensitive to comments about my tone)
So what I think we have here is two camps, one camp cares a lot about what a bass looks like and how it got that look and by doing so they attribute a lot of value to that perspective. The other camp would play any bass that floats their boat (with some reservations I'm sure) but definitely does not care what anybody else is playing.
So you tell me, who's being more pretentious here? The one's who find multiple reasons for a bass guitar to be "wrong" or "inauthentic" or the camp who doesn't care?
Who cares if there's road worn hate. If you like the bass, play it.
No man, all the mojo is in older, roadworn, authentic breasts that have been manhandled for the past 50 years.