• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Wireless and dynamics

I've been checking the wireless threads here and all the discussion seems to be about reliability and dropouts and interference, nobody mentions sound quality. My concern is attack and response - wouldn't wireless have less of this than wired? But nobody is talking about it so I guess it isn't a problem?

TIA,
Nathan
 
My concern is attack and response...
nobody is talking about it so I guess it isn't a problem?


Never for me...
I just was reading wireless threads this am. I'm still using my L6 G50 wireless units. (other than the battery door & bad on/off on one transmitter I use at home only)
I've never had an issue with reception, dropouts, or an appreciable difference in dynamics.
They also reduce hum noticeably by eliminating the cable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ggaa and LowWay
Which of the Shure GLX-D+ number is best for electric bass? I play through a Quad Cortex to FOH and IEMs. Not a lot of distance but lots of lights (big screen behind me). Appreciate the insight in advance.
 
My main gigging bass is a passive jazz bass and use the Sennheiser XSW. It sounds better using the wireless than when I use a jack cable. I guess it’s an impedance / inductance thing.
I also gig with a BSX EUB (Electric Upright Bass) which has an active preamp and the sound quality is identical when using the XSW vs a jack cable. With the EUB, it looks a lot better without having cable.

Been using the Sennheiser XSW for a couple of years and I have two transmitters so can swap over when one is running low on charge (have replaced the stock battery and get about 4hours usage per charge)
 
I've been checking the wireless threads here and all the discussion seems to be about reliability and dropouts and interference, nobody mentions sound quality. My concern is attack and response - wouldn't wireless have less of this than wired? But nobody is talking about it so I guess it isn't a problem?

TIA,
Nathan
Never had a problem. I used an A/B switch to from wireless to direct to check the overall difference and I didn’t hear any at all. I’ve been using the Line 6 G30 for over 10 years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LowActionHero
Dynamics are exactly why I spent $2100 on a Lectrosonics bass wireless system. Industrial grade, Superbowl choice for onfield officials’ wireless needs.

That was 15 years ago. The Lectro saw a lotta miles since then. I had the transmitter pack serviced for $400 several years ago. Then the press-to-power button got really hard to press, so I retired the Lectro rig (still use it occasionally) and went with the Sennheiser EW-D. An RF guru I’m friends with suggested that the price of high-quality digital wireless had come way down and he thought I’d be happy with the Sennheiser.

It hasn’t disappointed in the least.


Latency next to nothing, dynamics are great.
 
  • Like
Reactions: erayser
Older analog systems used to compress the signal as part of the process. Companders in the transmitter and expanders in the receiver squished and restored the signal, leading to some remaining compression ime
However modern digital systems don’t deal with this in the same way.
When I moved from analog to digital 20 odd years ago, I realised quite how much it was compressing my signal.
I’m now using a shure glxd+ pedalboard system. Absolutely fantastic wireless- no dropouts, interference, or audible compression.
 
Which of the Shure GLX-D+ number is best for electric bass? I play through a Quad Cortex to FOH and IEMs. Not a lot of distance but lots of lights (big screen behind me). Appreciate the insight in advance.
The pack is the glxd1 (glxd2 are the mics).

For receiver it depends what you want. GLXD6 is build for a pedal board and has a built in tuner, so if you want it on the floor in front of you, then that's your choice.

GLXD4 is the regular receiver which comes in two versions. The 4 and the 4R - the 4R is optimised for rack mount, while the slightly cheaper 4 isn't (though you can put it on a rack shelf no problem).

When they sell a set they use both numbers so you probably want the glxd16+ or glxd14+ set.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wheelsup247
Thank, that’s all good to know. I think I’ll get a Shure GLX-D+. It seems to be a popular and reliable choice.
I also have a Shure system, not certain if it's the same model. Not at home to look. Never had issues and I can admit I've gotten pretty lax about having a cable ready to go as a backup over the last 10+ years I've had it.

I use it all the time, practice and gigs.
 
I've been checking the wireless threads here and all the discussion seems to be about reliability and dropouts and interference, nobody mentions sound quality. My concern is attack and response - wouldn't wireless have less of this than wired? But nobody is talking about it so I guess it isn't a problem?

TIA,
Nathan
Greetings. As for dynamics and sound quality I just finished up a similar thread for basic entry level gear and tried the Lekato wireless set up. It worked just fine, but to my ears it DID squash the dynamic range and more complex harmonics of the bass notes. It was subtle but noticeable in my practice studio and I did prefer the cabled sound. BUT, in a band setting with other instruments playing I do not think one would notice it at all. Since I do not play out, but practice a lot in my practice area, I felt that I much preferred the small, but present superior sound of a cabled connection. That being said, I suspect that a much higher professional wireless rig would be much better in this regard, but I do not have real life experience with that. Perhaps this is "you get what you pay for". I did return the Lekato set at Amazon. Ohhh, and I did NOT notice any latency, attack, or response issues.
 

Latest posts