• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Wood vs. Carbon Fiberlass with sound samples

Which bass is which?

  • Audio Sample #1 is Carbon Fiberglass and #2 is the Wooden Bass

    Votes: 31 51.7%
  • Audio Sample #1 is the Wooden Bass and #2 is the Carbon Fiberglass Bass

    Votes: 22 36.7%
  • I can't tell, or I prefer frets, or fretted carrots, or I don't care they are both Butt Ugly!

    Votes: 7 11.7%

  • Total voters
    60
The first tune is Percy Jones the second is Hansford Rowe :)

I wish I saw this earlier as I would say the second was the carbon bass and not because of material tone but because of the sound of the neck pickup based on it's distance from the bridge.
 
To go into a bit more detail on the first soloed neck parts of each MP3, one sounds more like a P and one somewhat like a Stingray. I attribute that to pickup placement.

IIRC Percy played that when he still played a fretless P and track 1 sounds darn close. Tone wise ;)
 
You are correct Koki, I was surprised too.

Good on you Bob! Actually the second one is from Gong, I can't remember who was that on that? Was it Hansford back then? I know he plays with Gongzilla now.

Some of my favorite lines, I just put the whole thing together fast and those came to mind first.

And I do agree with the pickup placement idea, I have noticed the closer the pickups the more of a Musicman tone when they are blended together. Also closer to the bridge does that too.
Dirk
 
So according to results the most people voted wrong. That's really bad.

I think it's great that the majority of people got it wrong. A lot of people are dogmatic when it comes to materials. I'm not accusing anyone here of fitting that description, but I do think that those who feel like the use of CF dominates the tone equation (in a bad way, especially) might have to rethink their position based on the number of incorrect guesses. The use of wood x versus wood y should be an even more subtle difference.
 
I think it's great that the majority of people got it wrong. A lot of people are dogmatic when it comes to materials. I'm not accusing anyone here of fitting that description, but I do think that those who feel like the use of CF dominates the tone equation (in a bad way, especially) might have to rethink their position based on the number of incorrect guesses. The use of wood x versus wood y should be an even more subtle difference.

I gotta say, I was wrong and I use those materials in my basses!

But as I said, that carbon fiberglass bass doesn't sound like a Steinberger for example. So materials aside, it's all in the construction.
 
Yeah I wish I had all the answers, this was my first rebuild using such an alien material. I'm amazed and loving the outcome so nothing else really matters. :) Well especially since it's is for me. LOL
And another thing I find interesting is that people are still voting wrong even though I already told the answer?
I really wish I could find the original maker, they had some great ideas and a decent grasp on building. Well certainly better than I could do with fiberglass sheets, epoxy, and carbon graphite. I think I'll stick with wood for now on my own creations, but it's not due to sound. :)
Dirk
 
I think it's great that the majority of people got it wrong. A lot of people are dogmatic when it comes to materials. I'm not accusing anyone here of fitting that description, but I do think that those who feel like the use of CF dominates the tone equation (in a bad way, especially) might have to rethink their position based on the number of incorrect guesses. The use of wood x versus wood y should be an even more subtle difference.

Amen.