• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Worship Bass Pedalboards

Updates:
Got the Kilt 10. It definitely offers more lower gain drive settings that seem quite useable. However, as discussed below, I think I will use the DCX for my occasional OD needs. Our tech staff loved the DCX when I used it last week.

Did a lot of analysis between preamps as I've been tone seeking a more refined clean pro sound: the Tone Hammer, DCX Bass, JHS Colourbox 10, Trickfish Minnow, and Origin Bassrig Fifteen. I ended up selecting the Trickfish Minnow and am seeing the value of their lovely 4-band EQ. Still keeping the DCX on the board for light saturation or OD duties. The Tone Hammer is sold and returned the Colourbox and Bassrig to Sweetwater. Trickfish currently has a holiday discount on the Minnow and allows returns, FYI. (Still hunting a Noble.....)

Updated assemblage. The Minnow provides mute and tuner out, so the tuner is no longer on the board, plugged into the Minnow and sitting on the floor in monitor mode and battery powered. The input buffer is now provided by the DCX.

View attachment 7380975
Enjoying your thought process @projectapollo

So in this chain, how are you using the PnP? Light compression? Little more grit?
 
What is the signal chain? Is it: DCX - Subsonic - Strymon - JHS pulp'n'peel - Minnow?

If it is, what consideration made you to put octaver after overdrive?...and compressor after delay?

Thank you.
Enjoying your thought process @projectapollo

So in this chain, how are you using the PnP? Light compression? Little more grit?
Yes, the chain is straight across the board DCX > Octave > Modulation > Comp > Pre/EQ/DI.

I like the DCX first in chain as a chain buffer and maximum sensitivity to touch.

The Subsonic continues to track well after the DCX in EQ saturation mode. I'm not a huge OC-2 fan, but the subsonic remains because of its superior tracking and headroom. I using octave down these days as barely audible during bigger choruses to add heft. Gregor Fris video suggested that use and it works quite well. I prefer the tones available in the Aguilar Octamizer, but it tracks poorly for me, especially with a pick.

I also use the octaver in combination with the Brig modulated delay for ambient moments and it sounds quite beautiful. I often play in the ambient sections to add a layer since the CCM recorded stuff is just filled with layers and our keyboard and sky guitar can only do so much. Bass player to the rescue! Or ego? Not sure, but it sounds great.

I prefer compression at the end of the chain but the Minnow forces it to that location. I use the Pulp N Peel for nice sounding compression, so easy to dial in by ear and makes the rig a bit more punchy. The blendable dirt circuit is a handy option if you needed some more dirt on a given week. I can see changing the PNP to an Origin Cali76 (match the DCX) but the cost difference at the moment is barrier. The PNP is Black Friday super discounted on Amazon with free returns! The orange adds a touch of joy to the board, as well.

The DCX and PNP are cool pedals because they each can fulfill multiple roles.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Zbysek
I like the DCX first in chain as a chain buffer and maximum sensitivity to touch.
I see. I didn't realise that DCX was buffered bypass...

The Subsonic continues to track well after the DCX in EQ saturation mode.
That's good to know. I always try to follow the Broughton recommendation to keep the signal clean prior to octaver...

 
I keep my compressor near the end of the chain. I like it before the preamp because I want the pre to be the final voice in the chain. I like everything about it, so I don't want to mess with it. I've also put my higher gain drive before my lower gain drive. I felt like I was losing a touch of bottom when the higher drive came after. For some reason it works better this way. I am using the Southland into the Lightspeed (both by Greer amps).
 
I see. I didn't realise that DCX was buffered bypass...


That's good to know. I always try to follow the Broughton recommendation to keep the signal clean prior to octaver...

Yes, the Origin stuff is expensive but quality.
Truly, I could be more traditional and place the PNP first (it has the JHS little black buffer circuit in it), then octave, then modulation, then DCX. I've tried both ways with similar results.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rcmbass and Zbysek
My current pedalboard for drone/noise
IMG_3946.jpeg
 
IMG_2213.jpeg
I am trying to even out the relative volumes of the different presets I am using and need some help. If I am adjusting the output of the presets so that the VUMP meter shows more or less consistent peak levels, the volumes should be the same right? I thought I had things leveled out but at rehearsal last night the MD said the preset I used that had the most drive effect sounded much louder than all the other presets. Any help and advice is much appreciated. thanks!
 
While the same db is a good start it's not the full picture.

The drive one may be more compressed and therefore is more consistently at the higher level. Also it may tweak the EQ to be more mids heavy and cuts through more.


View attachment 7381798I am trying to even out the relative volumes of the different presets I am using and need some help. If I am adjusting the output of the presets so that the VUMP meter shows more or less consistent peak levels, the volumes should be the same right? I thought I had things leveled out but at rehearsal last night the MD said the preset I used that had the most drive effect sounded much louder than all the other presets. Any help and advice is much appreciated.
 
It could have to do with the frequencies more than the output. I'm not a sound engineer, but I feel like bass guitar can be boosted in the mix more than guitars before it starts to 'sound loud.' Maybe the drive that you're using is cutting a bit of the low end and more mids are hitting the speakers. It's the same db level, but the frequencies are sticking out more. During sound check, my bass is super loud. But, then they boost it a bit more because when the sanctuary fills up, bodies absorb the low end.
I'm just throwing that out for discussion. I don't have any data to back it up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rcmbass
I thought I had things leveled out but at rehearsal last night the MD said the preset I used that had the most drive effect sounded much louder than all the other presets.
This is normal. Drive adds harmonics...which makes the tone sound louder (perceived loudness)

 
Last edited:
This is normal. Drive adds harmonics...which makes the tone sound louder (perceived loudness)

Thanks for this. So if it perceived as louder then should I back it off anyways, as perception becomes the reality? I've adjusted the output volume of the preset and it now peaks at a lower level than all my other presets
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zbysek
Thanks for this. So if it perceived as louder then should I back it off anyways, as perception becomes the reality? I've adjusted the output volume of the preset and it now peaks at a lower level than all my other presets
For live It's finding a happy medium by talking to your MD and sound guys. Let them know what you're going for so they understand why you're coming through more.
 
For those in the NAM world I made a capture of the tone hammer with the classic bethel settings on a passive J with rounds. I think I turned out really good.

There's a LOT of compression happening in the tone hammer with AGS engaged that's not being captured but the drive it definitely got.

 
Last edited:
You always have the most artistic photos… and great gear too!
My photos all look blurry with horrible lighting.
I arrived at our student worship center before everyone else and was able to get some good lighting. Using my iPhone. Samples attached.
I just acquired this European AV Basses AVP5 from @NickyBass. Excellent passive 34" 5-string P.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2952 (1).jpeg
    IMG_2952 (1).jpeg
    580.4 KB · Views: 21
  • IMG_2941.jpeg
    IMG_2941.jpeg
    680.3 KB · Views: 13
  • IMG_2939.jpeg
    IMG_2939.jpeg
    430.2 KB · Views: 22
  • IMG_2937.jpeg
    IMG_2937.jpeg
    561.6 KB · Views: 19
Last edited: