There was a thread about this subject not long ago, but here it is again .. VOX AC60, very bad, very bad indeed.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Exact same experienceFender Rumbles. I've owned 3. Loud, light and cheap? Yep. Usable tone? Nope. Too much mud and boominess for me. I couldn't do the Rumble mumble.

Urgh that kustom! Horrible lol
Would love to know the reasons why the amps were so bad.
, I don't rate the new ones much better ether.The off-brand excuse (Kingston maybe?) that came in trade with my first bass. Had a couple of 10" speakers that may have been mediocre for guitar mounted in an open-back cabinet. The amp may have put out ten watts with twenty percent distortion. Made the bass loud enough to hear, but that was it...![]()
It may also be worth noting the style of music you tried to play with said amp. I see there is already some hate brewing for the Rumbles, but if you're trying to blow metal through them, you're definitely not going to get a favorable voicing.
To answer OP, anything Crate. Or Sonic. You get what you pay for. They couldn't handle gigging the rock and roll.
I wasn't trying to be a richard about it. I was just saying. Different strokes, different folks, that's the way it goes.It's easier to quote than to make assumptions and be "subtle" in your response.
Anyways, Crate is garbage too. Does Seismic Audio even count as a cab?
They named it accurately...Without a doubt, any of the Fender Rumble series. Mud, mud, and more mud. Nothing defining, nothing inspiring.
+1. The one I played was part of a supplied backline at a show, so I didn't have any alternative. I wanted that thing to sound good, but just couldn't get it to cooperate.early 70s Kustom. The blue sparkle roll & tuck was the only good thing about it.