Looks more like an "acid-spill" bass to me than a relic. But that's why there are so many different flavors of ice cream. To each his own...
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Looks like a cross between an oil spill and a wildfire.
![]()
How "authentic" can it be with a new pickguard, bridge, pickup covers, control plate, etc.![]()
A lot of people apparently confuse 'relic' with 'water damaged'....Not a bass, but this is on the local craigslist, being sold as a "relic" strat...
Needs a few coats of clearcoat to protect that road worn finish![]()
Here I don't mind the finish but I find too much contrast between the brand new hardware and the paint job. Price for relic is on the low side of things compared to a Nash. Different animals for sure that being said.
A lot of people apparently confuse 'relic' with 'water damaged'....
Wow. Really surprised so many like that thing. Looks like someone spilled a giant can of butt ugly all over it, but to each his own. Maybe he should swap the word "relic" for "acid splashed" or "nuclear blasted" and it would be more appropriate.
This is what a fake "relic" should look like:
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
^ That's the thing. You see all sorts of wacky wear on vintage instruments, but faked relics need to follow typical wear patterns lest they look fake.
I don't get the idea that this is somehow a good deal. It doesn't look like much time was spent on that relic. When builders who specialize in relic-ing go at it, they take lots of time to replicate natural wear patterns and make it look authentic with all the little details and intricacies. That's not what was done here. They took a $250 bass and did something to it.
