Well that is good to hear.They do. In a June 2, 2021 letter they said paid $4 billion to the music industry in the previous 12 months. The figure was $3 billion in 2019.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Well that is good to hear.They do. In a June 2, 2021 letter they said paid $4 billion to the music industry in the previous 12 months. The figure was $3 billion in 2019.
Well that is good to hear.
So in my area this contract has circulated in the wineries , it is a junk contract used for bands , WAYYYY over blown for doing a gig ( might be from realestate ?? )
Would you sign it ??? and *** are they thinking ??
Buzz
For me its #9 "content" and #14 "Venue name". So what if the venue decides that your performance is not "first rate"? Will posting on FB the name of the winery be in violation?So in my area this contract has circulated in the wineries , it is a junk contract used for bands , WAYYYY over blown for doing a gig ( might be from realestate ?? )
Would you sign it ??? and *** are they thinking ??
Buzz
So what if the venue decides that your performance is not "first rate"?
How in the hell is the band supposed to ensure that no one in the venue records the performance? (Item 15)
IF I were going to do a lot of these gigs and routinely face this same contract (you say the local wineries all use it), I wouldn't sign a damn thing UNTIL I got my own lawyer to decipher and advise.
The Muzik Bidness is awash in guys that didn't want to pay to get professional counsel, from bar bands doing local gigs all the way to the Beatles, the Stones, and so many, many others, that got screwed as 'they didn't know what they were signing'.
Don't join that list.
I think this is a case of the venue trying not to pay the rights fees.That may be true, but I don't see how that would be practical from the venue's perspective. It's sort of like asking your customers to buy a liquor license before they order a drink. The obligation is on the wrong party. But who knows? Weirder things have been tried, I'm sure.
I have seen venues that don't pay for an ASCAP/BMI license, and they only allowed original bands to play there. Covers were strictly forbidden and the ASCAP/BMI guys paid regular visits.
To me it seems like a way to claim plausible deniability if they are caught. "We thought the band was paying that. It's in the contract!" Never mind the fact that no band ever pays that, nor is there even a way for bands to pay it. They just want something to point to if it comes up to get them off the hook.I think this is a case of the venue trying not to pay the rights fees.
To me it seems like a way to claim plausible deniability if they are caught. "We thought the band was paying that. It's in the contract!" Never mind the fact that no band ever pays that, nor is there even a way for bands to pay it. They just want something to point to if it comes up to get them off the hook.
My question is why hasn’t there been a count on the number of pets that have died of covid?
I don't think this was written by an attorney. I do think this was probably someone with the venue who is trying to "do the right thing" but didn't know where to stop or how to address the real issues.
Until you sign, everything is negotiable. I would take my concerns to the venue and I wouldn't sign anything until I was satisfied we had an fair and reasonable agreement.
If it's all or nothing, I think I would pass.
The problem is it's not whether your band socks, it's whether they think you suck. Something completely different. If they want to hire you they need to do the scouting. And if you are offering to play, they got to listen around whether you are good or take the chance...If your band sucks, that would be your fault, not theirs for hiring you. Just like everything else that could possibly go wrong on this gig.
Yeah, but will they refuse payment because you did not play like a "first rate" band? Or maybe pay you less?If your band sucks, that would be your fault, not theirs for hiring you. Just like everything else that could possibly go wrong on this gig.
So in my area this contract has circulated in the wineries , it is a junk contract used for bands , WAYYYY over blown for doing a gig ( might be from realestate ?? )
Would you sign it ??? and *** are they thinking ??
Buzz
I've yet to be asked to sign a contract.That may be true, but I don't see how that would be practical from the venue's perspective. It's sort of like asking your customers to buy a liquor license before they order a drink. The obligation is on the wrong party. But who knows? Weirder things have been tried, I'm sure.
I have seen venues that don't pay for an ASCAP/BMI license, and they only allowed original bands to play there. Covers were strictly forbidden and the ASCAP/BMI guys paid regular visits.