• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

XVive U4 vs something else

Hey,
So I’m looking to get into the in-ear stuff and the xvive u4 caught my attention. However, some people complain about it being mono, which I don’t understand. Why would a mono in ear-system sound worse than a stereo one, isn’t guitar and bass mono anyway?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rick Penrose
I looked at it, and in the end was not impressed. The price for a low-end mono wireless system is high, and $460 when comparing to stereo units. There was two things I could not find about it. First was whether the receiver has a limiter to protect hearing.

The other is what frequencies does it use. It's important to find 2.4ghz units that use frequencies outside of WiFi 1-11 channels.

So, I'm waiting for something better to come along.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SleazyB
I have this setup, and used in a gig a few weeks ago. I love it. It is the way to go.
I will say that (at least my set up) most PA systems are not set up in stereo. Unless you are panning the inputs, the left and right channels are the same.
There are a few minor drawbacks that I easily over came (I will write up later), but over all I love it.

Awesome set up for <$250 for the base unit, and $120 for extra receivers.

It may not be perfect, but I think it's the best inexpensive IEM system out there.
 
Hey,
So I’m looking to get into the in-ear stuff and the xvive u4 caught my attention. However, some people complain about it being mono, which I don’t understand. Why would a mono in ear-system sound worse than a stereo one, isn’t guitar and bass mono anyway?

Depending on the sound system / venue / engineer you might be able top get a stereo mix of the other musicians which really helps with separation and to help keeping the levels down. If you are happy enough to play with the latest DiGiCo boards or outboard systems, you might even get some impressive surround immersive mixes (see e.g. KLANG - Immersive In-Ear Mixing with Intuitive Control)...
 
It really depends on how many outputs you have. Stereo IEM's burn up outputs FAST. I have 16 (plus LR main) outs, and I used them all with a country band recently (6 stereo outs, and the rest to wedges).
If you only have 4 or 6 or whatever aux mixes avail. you will want to go mono anyway.
 
  • Like
Reactions: steve_rolfeca
When I first got IEM's, I found the way everything blended together in my head very distracting, compared to what I heard with wedges because we were physically spread out across the stage.

Trying to get everything balanced out was a pain, and I ticked off a lot of sound guys, asking for small volume tweaks. Of course the minute the curtain dropped, the mix went to @#^! anyway, because everybody jumped in louder and harder than at sound check.

It wasn't until the first time that I played at a venue with a well set-up Aviom system, that I understood the value of pan pots and stereo IEM's. Stereo feeds isn't about getting an immersive, ambient mix- it's about being able to separate the sound of the other sources from your own voice and/or instrument.

Get the guitar and keys panned fairly hard left and right, and spread the lead and BGV's across the spectrum a bit. Leave my bass and the drums dead center, and everyone gets what they need, even if it isn't what they prefer:
  • The drummer and I are forced to pay attention to locking in with each other.
  • If the keys or guitar suddenly get drastically louder or softer, it's less distracting because they're way off to the sides.
  • Ditto for the vocalists- even just a bit of separation left and right makes it easier for them to compare whether they're getting a bit pitchy. Plus, the extra separation makes it easier for them to get a more reliable pitch reference off the keys, bass and guitar.
In a situation where there's only 4 aux outs available for 4 or 5 people, I'm finding that I'd rather have two independent monitor mixes, with each one panned fairly wide for good separation. Then, just let me pick which one I prefer between the two...

For me, that's what makes the Xvive a non-starter. There's no possibility for a stereo mix with them.
 
I've used one on a few gigs and they work fine. Stereo is great if you have a stereo AUX to run them off but mono works fine for live use.

The only issue is if the transmitter is plugged in close to another cable it can induce some noise in that cable. I get around this by plugging the transmitter into a short mic lead and locating away from other transmitter/receivers and cables.

The XVive wireless system also works reasonably well but can induce some noise in some active basses. With the guitar unit I've had some interference with wireless mics but again keeping the receiver away from other units solves the problem. The latency is minimal but when I compared it to my Line 6 55 it is noticeable on an A/B test.

For such small units though they seem to work OK.
 
Just to hurl my two cents in - I used a U4 for around a year as a way to practice quietly without having cables tangled everywhere. Noticed that the sound fidelity is pretty ordinary (I have Shure Se435s, so not terrible headphones and also used it with Phil Jones Bass Headphones) and that it is super sensitive to interference. Just over a year after purchase - and just out of warranty, natch! - it's started dropping out several times a minute, despite being within a couple of meters (six-seven feet) of the transmitter. Zero repair support from Xvive and pretty slim customer support in general. Given that you can get a far more professional unit for not a huge amount more money I'd avoid the U4 if you're considering it. It's a disposable piece of gear and I think too expensive given that.
 
Hey,
So I’m looking to get into the in-ear stuff and the xvive u4 caught my attention. However, some people complain about it being mono, which I don’t understand. Why would a mono in ear-system sound worse than a stereo one, isn’t guitar and bass mono anyway?
I have it an use it. It is very good. When I gig other band members are fiddling around with their item setup. Mine just works. Not particularly high end but it does what I need it to.
 
Hey,
So I’m looking to get into the in-ear stuff and the xvive u4 caught my attention. However, some people complain about it being mono, which I don’t understand. Why would a mono in ear-system sound worse than a stereo one, isn’t guitar and bass mono anyway?
I use them every weekend. Our lead singer also. No trouble and easy setup. All run of the mill bar gigs though, nothing very high end.