• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Yamaha PB-1 preamp

I had two of those over the course of many years. (even though I couldn't get a real hi-fi tone out of it, It was the most solid, quickest responding pre- I ever had. Always kicking myself for selling it)
Use a Y cord to hit both inputs on your power amp.

The flattest setting I ever got was using the parametric EQ. I centered the frequency at 2K (highest freq) and selected a somewhat narrow "Q", then I CUT it 3-4 DB. I had the tone controls at: treble all the way up, Mid 3:00 o'clock, Bass 12:00 straight up. (you can blow speakers with that bass all the way up) I was playing with a top 40 funk band with a MTD Grendel so I was going for that Marcus Miller slap tone. (never quite got it with that pre, but Mr Eden WT-800 helped out some)

My favorite signal path if using two different cabinets, I would use the low out going to a 15 (as a sub, crossing over around 120-150)and use the main full range output going to a 2-10 cabinet. (Or a single 12/tweeter cab) hope that dosent confuse.
 
...if a company like Thunderfunk can resurrect an old but classic design... why can't that same company (or another) do the same for the PB-1?

Just a thought! :D

By the way, wasn't there a version with not one, but two parametric banks? PB-2? I seem to remember seeing something along those lines once upon a time.
 
bigbajo60 said:
...if a company like Thunderfunk can resurrect an old but classic design... why can't that same company (or another) do the same for the PB-1?

Just a thought! :D

Dave Funk didn't work for Yamaha... and Yamaha didn't sell him the leftover stock from the production lines
:hmm:

Too bad, he made some nice additions the the AMP BH line (I owned a BH-260 through most the 90's)
 
NOLABASS said:
My 2 cents. Owned that pre for most of the '80s. Ran it through a power amp and Mesa Boogie 4-12. Rocked. If you can find a BB series Yamaha Bass from that early 80's period, buy it! That pre was made for that bass, great combo. I had a green,5 piece neck through BB1200S stolen from me in Atlanta, miss that bass to this day. :(




I'd like to second what Nola said. I use my PB-1 in church as a direct out and I use it as a backup to my normal rig and it is great. The 80's BB series basses are great; you can get them cheap and they sound and play really nice, very Fender like with alot of detail in the tone.
 
back from the dead question:
are the bass/mid/treble cascading and interactive like the old fender tone stack; or, independent in their operation?

cascading and interactive - based on fender tone stack - as far as I have been told...

- my stereo preamp has no tone controls and even has a 'bypass' button to cut out a whole section of the preamp, giving a really unadulterated signal. I wish someone would start including a 'bypass' button on bass preamps to totally take the tone controls out of the signal which would give a truly 'flat' setting...
 
Here is the link to a pdf of the older PB-1 manual, complete with the actual internal circuit schematic. The bass-mid-treble controls ARE in fact a Fender tone stack, with the treble frequency moved down a bit (25%) to bring in a little upper midrange with the treble.

Link Removed
 
<SNIP> my stereo preamp has no tone controls and even has a 'bypass' button to cut out a whole section of the preamp, giving a really unadulterated signal. I wish someone would start including a 'bypass' button on bass preamps to totally take the tone controls out of the signal which would give a truly 'flat' setting...

My EA iAmp800 provides this feature; it's great to be able to push a button to engage/disengage the EQ section. That said, I've never seen a plot that shows its frequency response with the EQ section bypassed, so I can't claim it's truly flat in the bypass mode.