TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
But what to say to him? We're using these next three months as a kind of "trial" to see if he gets better, but should we let him know? How long until after the gig in November should we wait to make it seem like we're not just using him? I realise how weird that sounds considering he's our drummer, but knowing him, that's how he would feel.
The rehearsal space is very barebones, it's only just acceptable, but I get what you mean. And despite everything, we really do want it to work out. I don't feel like we're stringing him along; we know all about his personal situation and we've given him a chance to better himself, because we really do want it to work in the long run. Getting rid of him is absolutely not a decision we can make lightly, every outcome has to be weighed, regardless of the upcoming gig.My issue is that it sounds like OP already knows the drummer is gone, but he doesn't want to give up his cushy rehearsal space until after their big gig - they are just stringing the drummer along until then. IF the gig wasn't on the horizon, the guy would be gone now. I find that unethical.
The rehearsal space is very barebones, it's only just acceptable, but I get what you mean. And despite everything, we really do want it to work out. I don't feel like we're stringing him along; we know all about his personal situation and we've given him a chance to better himself, because we really do want it to work in the long run. Getting rid of him is absolutely not a decision we can make lightly, every outcome has to be weighed, regardless of the upcoming gig.
It's normal in the corporate business world.You don't feel like you are stringing him along, but you haven't said anything to him yet, and the band is "all in agreement, he has to go, but after the gig"...
If keep him until after the gig and then spring it on him (and have already decided it now), I think it is a bush league move. As I said, how would you feel if someone pulled that on you?
Here's the thing, I'm in a great band right now, playing music I love, selling lots of merch at gigs, just having a good time. The problem is our drummer, the weak link.
He's an alright drummer, but very barebones, has a bit of a "that's good enough" attitude.
He converted his garage into a rehearsel room. It's small, has terrible acoustics, the layout is all wrong, but it's ours. Problem is he lives half an hours drive from the city the rest of us live in, and since the rest of us are students, he's the only one with a car. Any one of us can cancel for any reason and the rest can go rehearse, but if he cancels, that's it. And he cancels a lot. We try to rehearse once a week, but realistically it averages out to twice a month. What really gets me though is how he cancels the night before, because he "just remembered" he has made other plans. He also rarely checks his messages which makes it frustratingly hard to make plans.
Now I would be quite happy cutting him loose right now, but we've got a major gig coming up in November, and finding a new rehearsel space, a new drummer, and getting him up to speed with the material in time just isn't going to happen. I've taken the role as de facto BL in lieu of anyone else, and have "gone behind the drummer's back" to see if anyone feels the same, and we're all in agreement, he has to go, but after the gig.
But what to say to him? We're using these next three months as a kind of "trial" to see if he gets better, but should we let him know? How long until after the gig in November should we wait to make it seem like we're not just using him? I realise how weird that sounds considering he's our drummer, but knowing him, that's how he would feel.
It's obvious his first priority is his other band, and that's fine, we're all good friends and have played countless gigs together, but I'm afraid letting him go will sour relations with the rest of his other band. So what's the most diplomatic way of telling him to jog on?
The three months are also for finding said drummer and a new rehearsal space, much easier said than doneFirst off, i never hire thise who "negatively plan" their schedule. By this I mean, we are going to rehearse Thursday night from 6-9:00pm. I expect everyone to put that on their schedule if we have all agreed.
I do not want to hear, something else came up unless it involves a wake or a hospital visit.
Apparently some people are fine with saying okay but if something else comes up your date is cancelled. Unfortunately they don't tell you that initially, you have to suss that out yourself.
Heaven forbid you commit and work the rest of your schedule to fit.
Fire these morons.
You can't break in a drummer by November, seriously?
Don't let him know its a trial, he'll ditch you anyways.
Tell him why you are dumping him, in detailed form.
See what he says, he might not be willing to change, but expecting him to get better without telling him is folly.
Be ready to replace him, immediately.
Seriously, November? You have 2 plus months plus for getting a competent drummer.