• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Yet another MM Stingray thread!

Hey guys.

I was putting my unused pedals up on ebay when I realised that if I sold my pedals, ESP F-404 + ESP Hardshell case and my defretted Ibanez JTKB I would have enough money to afford my dream bass, a Musicman Stingray!

Anyway, I'm asking for peoples opinions and reviews on this instrument. Also, I've played my bass teachers' MM Sterling and I was wondering what the actual differences between the Stingray and the Sterling are?

Cheers.
 
I had a Stingray, a new one in 2001. It was translucent orange with a matching headstock, and that beautiful quilted maple neck. Solid as a rock and the fit and finish were amazing. I found it be a one trick pony, however. I loved that punchy, springy midrange, but try as I might, I couldn't get too many different sounds out of it. But it may be just what you're looking for.
 
I just recently bought a Stingray from the 1970s era. Its a bit beat up but it does play great and yes it does seem to have that one thing it does well - and i love it!

I am also curious about the differences between a Stingray and a Sterling?

I have to say i am quite happy that i bought this sunburst 2-band EQ Stingray. I would like to try a 5 string Stingray.

Dave
 
Sterlings have a smaller body size all the way around. Also the Sterling uses different electronics: the pickup has ceramic magnets instead of alnico like the StingRay. The Sterling also has coil switching: parallel/single coil/series, where the StingRay is only wired in parallel.

Even with all that said, I love and use the StingRay mostly. Not a one trick pony at all, I played it in metal, country, and more recently also use in a folk rock type of band I sub in alot. And certainly they've been used in plenty of soul/R&B bands.
 
I like the Sterling better personally. The narrower Jazz-width neck is more comfortable for me than the Stingray neck. I also like the darker tone I get from the series pickup setting vs the clearer parallel Stingray tone. You can easily find a Sterling that weighs less than 9 lbs, very few Stingrays are that light.

Both are really great basses, you should try them both out. I didn't even mention the 2 pickup versions, my all-time fave MusicMan bass is the Sterling HH.
 
I wanted one since I got into bass. I also knew I couldn't afford it and tried to stave it off with some similar basses (including a very nice Ibanez). I was just about to buy something else Stingray-ish when I caved in and bought one.




You wont regret it.
 
They are both great basses. I have two Sterlings due to the slimmer Jazz neck and electronics options, but would love to add a stingray into my stable. Play both and see what feels right, to you. Back in1998 when I first looked for an Ernie Ball, all I wanted was a Stingray. Then I played both and the Sterling (IMO) felt better in my hands. It felt so good, that I eventually acquired two. Let us know how you make out. Also, Guitar Center is having sick deals on MM products. I saw a Stingray at my local GC, new for 999!
 
As previously mentioned, the Sterling has the smaller body & the thinner jazz-profile neck. It also has ceramic magnets in the pickups, giving it a more aggressive sound than the alnico-equipped Stingray. The Sterling also has the three position switch (five position if you go for the twin humbucker model.) This switches the bass between parallel (smooth & scooped), series (harsher in your face bass with a lot of mid boost) & single coil mode.

I've recently bought a June 2000 model Stingray with the piezo bridge. It's a hugely versatile bass with massive tone & sustain. Lovely!

The only gripe I have with the modern Rays/Sterlings is that the necks are unfinished and just sanded. Mine has been satin lacquered by a luthier, so it's a lot nicer, but the maple fingerboard models do tend to look grotty after a while, as the board is unvarnished.

Go to a store and try some. See which you like best!
 
The only gripe I have with the modern Rays/Sterlings is that the necks are unfinished and just sanded. Mine has been satin lacquered by a luthier, so it's a lot nicer, but the maple fingerboard models do tend to look grotty after a while, as the board is unvarnished.

Go to a store and try some. See which you like best!

I love the raw necks on my Sterlings. Seeing that wood darker from all my hand oil and sweat reinds me of how many great gigs I've played on those basses.
 
My first good bass was a StingRay. I sold it out of desparate starvation 20 years ago, and, after trudging through a hundred other basses since, have finally come back, and I'll never be without a StingRay again.

The OLD StingRays were one-trick pony's, yeah, but the NEW ones, ESPECIALLY the HH 'Rays, can get a LOT of different tones. Get one. You'll be very, very glad you did.
 
3 weeks ago I bought a blemished Stingray H from GC for $900. It is my third Stingray but this one is a return to it as I sold the other two off a ways back. I have had more fun playing the bass in the last three weeks than I have had in a year.

My other and #1 bass is a Warwick Corvette 5 $$ and I love it but I am also curious to go back and try a Stingray 5 again. The one trick pony thing is BS. You can make a Stingray work in any scenario. I (note that i only included myself) can very easily get caught up in tone controls and pickup configurations but I find the simplicity of a Stingray H to be a tremendous asset to the platform.

I say go for it.

Can't say anything one way or the other about a Sterling it's been probably ten years since I tried one out.
 
3 weeks ago I bought a blemished Stingray H from GC for $900. It is my third Stingray but this one is a return to it as I sold the other two off a ways back. I have had more fun playing the bass in the last three weeks than I have had in a year.

My other and #1 bass is a Warwick Corvette 5 $$ and I love it but I am also curious to go back and try a Stingray 5 again. The one trick pony thing is BS. You can make a Stingray work in any scenario. I (note that i only included myself) can very easily get caught up in tone controls and pickup configurations but I find the simplicity of a Stingray H to be a tremendous asset to the platform.

I say go for it.

Can't say anything one way or the other about a Sterling it's been probably ten years since I tried one out.

Simplicity is what attracts me to the Stingray.