Unfortunately, it was never published. The findings were nonsignificant (i.e., the statistical procedure inferred that we couldn't safely reject the null hypothesis, which may lead to a false positive - also known as a type II error). We ran a good experiment, but psychology, as a post-positivist science, is largely inductive. The premises from which we derived our hypotheses were most likely faulty. Such is scholarly research.
However, there is a pretty good body of literature on this type of stuff. For starters, I'd read an important article by Kahneman, Knetsch, and Thaler, called Fairness as a Constraint on Profit Seeking, which examines how people view certain economic actions as being fair or not. The way situations are framed is very important on whether or not people see things as being fair.
