I'll do anything that pays, but I greatly prefer real drums and it's not even close.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I was a skeptic until a few years ago. I got to play with a drummer who had a high end kit and great system to play through. More importantly, he loved playing them and learned all of the nuances to make the kit sound good. If your drummer doesn't like playing an e kit, he won't put that work in and it won't do well.
As a bassist, I love guys playing electronic kits. As a drummer, I am not a fan - the problem (and it is the only issue I have with them but a big one) is this; you can get an infinite number of sounds out of a real cymbal. The very best electronic kit I've played (the Roland, which is great) you can get maybe four. None of which sound right.
That being said, I'll be getting one in the next year or so. I don't think it's an optional tool in the drummer's toolkit anymore.
I'd say it's advanced more in the last 5 to 7 years than in the whole lifecycle before that. Anyone claiming that the sound of electronic kits is unconvincing may not have heard one lately. Even the cymbals sound really good now.Depends on how good the particular kit sounds. The technology has really coming a long way.
I'm with you on all this. In the average club-with-a-band-in-it, the drums sound like crap utterly.On the big stages, acoustic drums are no problem. But at most live gigs the every day working band plays (rock, blues, R & B, pop, etc.), the drums are in my view the biggest reason live music is dwindling. Because ordinarily, they just sound horrible. Harsh. Brash. More often than not too loud. And overall, just hard to tolerate without an alcohol buffer.
Before everybody starts taking aim with their flame throwers, I challenge anyone to listen to some live performances on You Tube. Then listen to some studio recordings. On the studio recordings, the drums are highly impactful, but ordinarily not harsh or brash. Often, the drums sound sweet and chewy. Because high grade microphones and massive signal processing are employed to record them. You may make the same compassion between the average bar band (or even function band) and what you hear drum wise at an EDM club with a massive sound system and music pre-recorded in a sophisticated studio. The facts are, there is no comparison.
I say regardless of their drawbacks, digital drums will in almost all cases sound better at the average bar gig / function gig than acoustic drums, and will make a big difference in how listenable the performance is going to be. Obviously, of you have a great drummer, then the differences are not as noticeable. How many of you are playing with such a drummer?
I keep hearing it’s about “volume” I’ve had the good fortune of playing with drummers that could groove down so low you could hear the audience talking. But the whole band was capable of breaking it down like that. But fake is the new real, carry on.
Our new drummer loves his expensive Roland kit. Have played with it, and others in the past, but not feeling the love. He is open to playing acoustic or digital, so not a problem. However, thought my bandmates would be in the same camp as far as disliking the digital kit, but they seem to be indifferent at the moment.
We play about 4 songs that fit the digital kit (Bust A Move, Rappers Delight, etc...) but the rest of the tunes are more classic, or had acoustic drums as part of the original recordings.
Thoughts
I would say try to work with it because...
1) It's coming anyway. Bass players aren't the only ones looking for lighter and easier load in- load out gear.
2) Volume control!