• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

ZOOM R16 Vs. TASCAM DP-24SD

  • Like
Reactions: The Chuck
How is the Tascam as a field recorder using no external mics? One of the things I love about my Zoom R16 is that the two onboard mics do a very good job of picking up a live performance in the field.
The Tascam DP-24SD is definitely more of a home studio recorder, IMHO. If field recording is what you're after, I'd get something else. Don't get me wrong, the Tascam is portable. I'd take it to a gig no prob. I can do mixes with it on my lap, but as a field recording unit, probably not so much. I'd never think about wearing it on a strap, for instance. I don't think the Tascam runs on batteries, either. Also, I've never seen a gig bag for the DP-24SD.
 
The Tascam DP-24SD is definitely more of a home studio recorder, IMHO. If field recording is what you're after, I'd get something else. Don't get me wrong, the Tascam is portable. I'd take it to a gig no prob. I can do mixes with it on my lap, but as a field recording unit, probably not so much. I'd never think about wearing it on a strap, for instance. I don't think the Tascam runs on batteries, either. Also, I've never seen a gig bag for the DP-24SD.
It's not a field recorder ... period. It doesn't run on batteries. There are many gig bags, hard cases, TSA cases that fit perfectly.
 
I've used the R16 as a live mixer for instances in which frequent changes to EQ, reverb, etc are not required. You can also do that through a DAW and use that to notch out feedback. It's obviously not as functional as a full mixer in that sense, but it's a lot smaller than my main mixer with still 2/3 the XLR connections.
 
I was ready to pull the trigger on the Zoom but then got thinking that for the extra $50 that the TASCAM looks to be at least a step up in both ease of use and features.



If you have any information or experience with either of them, I sure would appreciate knowing about it.

Thank you.
Tascam DP24SD I have It and It's very useful, It offers high quality preamps, audio and effects like studio performances and quality. I am working with it very fast and well, no clip, no latency, no freeze, no noise, you can edit tracks, cut, paste, move, silence regions, you can use wave loops and sequence like you want (for example drum loops) you can view and zooming the waveform for very precise cutting, copyng or pasting...the one thing that I miss is fade-in and fade-out functions for audio clips or samples, I hope that tascam will include in the next firmware updates.
 
Last edited:
Finally ordered it today- with a couple of mics.

Cool. Is that the Tascam DP24-SP ?


I have the Zoom R16 for live gigs and anything outside my home studio and I love almost everything about it.

For me, the prospect of dealing with a hard drive is a deal killer. I've had 3 DAW's with haed drives and they've all been constant problems. Using the micro SD chips in the Zoom is the only option for me.

If I have one criticism of the Zoom it's that the preamps are a bit noisier than other units I've worked with when the gain is turned up much past halfway. I can avoid this by ensuring that the source signal on each channel is loud enough but it sometimes means that I have to have an external preamp for that source.
 
Cool. Is that the Tascam DP24-SP ?


I have the Zoom R16 for live gigs and anything outside my home studio and I love almost everything about it.

For me, the prospect of dealing with a hard drive is a deal killer. I've had 3 DAW's with haed drives and they've all been constant problems. Using the micro SD chips in the Zoom is the only option for me.

If I have one criticism of the Zoom it's that the preamps are a bit noisier than other units I've worked with when the gain is turned up much past halfway. I can avoid this by ensuring that the source signal on each channel is loud enough but it sometimes means that I have to have an external preamp for that source.
It is the DP24-SD not SP. It uses SD cards. So far I'm liking it. It does what I need it to do just fine.
 
I'll be using my Zoom R16 tomorrow, but actually as a lighting controller via USB to a laptop and USB to DMX out.

I've also used it as an 8 in, dual mono out mixer run off a laptop to allow me to run sound remotely from a mixer when it turned out the 'mixing desk' in the venue was a mixer amp, virtually under the stage. You can network two laptops together (30m cable) and have a poor man's wireless mixer like a Behringer, if for a limited number of channels, and as long as you don't mind 10-15ms latency.
 
I'd really like to get back into a standalone multitrack, and these are the main contenders.

Reasons: Though I have always been able to get DAWs working perfectly, I am the type that gets a lot more work done with a standalone. I also just plain like them better for intangible reasons.

R16/24 pros: battery power, good internal mics, USB interface, and (R24) drum pads. Also, BIG feature here: two of them can be linked for simultaneous 16-track recording.

Tascam DP24/32 pros: the baddest portastudios ever made, and possibly the last of their class. More faders, more substantial interface, better screen, more tracks.

Given that I made full albums on 4-track 20 years ago, I can also see working with the newer 4, 6 or 8 tracks. Bouncing down with no quality loss? What is this, sorcery?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bassheart365
I'd really like to get back into a standalone multitrack, and these are the main contenders.

Reasons: Though I have always been able to get DAWs working perfectly, I am the type that gets a lot more work done with a standalone. I also just plain like them better for intangible reasons.

R16/24 pros: battery power, good internal mics, USB interface, and (R24) drum pads. Also, BIG feature here: two of them can be linked for simultaneous 16-track recording.

Tascam DP24/32 pros: the baddest portastudios ever made, and possibly the last of their class. More faders, more substantial interface, better screen, more tracks.

Given that I made full albums on 4-track 20 years ago, I can also see working with the newer 4, 6 or 8 tracks. Bouncing down with no quality loss? What is this, sorcery?

Have a look at the new Zoom livetrak, too. Better mic-preamps and some very thoughtfull features.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bearfoot
I picked up my Tascam DP-24SD tonight. It works very well. Incredibly intuitive and the playback is crystal, which I could never get from a DAW. I recorded 7 tracks simultaneously with no latency, noise or clipping at all. I made a mixdown master and it produced a finished product, 4 hours after picking it up. Now I think I might read the manual. Color me impressed!
Into the rabbit hole I go!!

View attachment 975937

Oh, I got the foot controller and a dust cover, too.

View attachment 975940 View attachment 975939
Damn you! hahaha.

I know this is an old thread (2016), but I'm currently looking at the following and trying to read up and get all the info I can before making a decision on which one to buy.

TASCAM DP-24SD 24-track Digital Portastudio - $499

TASCAM DP-32SD 32-track Digital Portastudio - $599

Zoom LiveTrak L-12 12-channel Digital Mixer / Recorder - $599

Zoom R24 24-track Recorder / Interface / Controller with Loop Sampler - $499

Zoom R16 16-track SD Recorder / Interface / Controller - $399

I just want to record an entire album with each instrument / vocals having it's own track. Drums obviously will have to be done on a seperate take.
 
Last edited:

Latest posts