Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice. Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads. Join freeLog in Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
if the loss in weight is worth the money spent to you, then do it!
Otherwise, to my knowledge, it's not like you'd be making an upgrade in other areas like features or power. so, if you really want to lose some extra weight in your rig I'd go for it, if it's just something you're "thinking of", I would recommend against it.
I have done the Ampeg BA500 for gigs (just one) and I will NEVER again use it. Not loud enough to say the least. Is it loud enough for you? Going the head/cab route is a better idea in the long run, but if the BA 500 is working great for you, no need to spend the money.
If the BA500 is working for you, the PF stack will crush for you. Lighter, sounds better, looks cooler. The BA500 is a good combo but the PF heads and cabs sound so much like the old B-15's it's crazy. If you want to get a light Ampeg rig with some balls, the PF stuff is amazing IMHO.
OK thanks for the great feedback. While out looking I came across a Ampeg SVT 15E cabinet for real cheap. I was told that I shouldn't use it as an extension to the BA500 because of it being 8 ohms.
First is this true? The BA500 is rated at 500 watts into 2 ohms (both would be 2.67).
Second has anyone used the SVT 15E alone and with what head?
BA500 is 2 ohm stable, and internal 2x10 is 4 ohms. Using an 8 ohm 1x15 with it, will not destroy the universe, but it will be unbalanced, to a degree. A better alternative to adding an 8 ohm 1x15 to the BA500 would be a 4 ohm 2x10 ext cab, but better still, dump the whole thing and go with the PF500 and a pair of 15's.