Hi guys,
Apart from the 'overkill' factor as far as loudness is concerned and the fact that that much power would never be necessary nowadays, could you guys name me advantages of having/running a 1000-watt head?
The head I'm thinking of is a Little Mark Ninja. I would mainly run it into a 212 Ninja cab (8 Ohm) rated at 800W as occasionally into a 4 Ohm 410 HF Markbass cab.
I currently own a LMIII (300 watts @ 8 Ohm) that I mainly used with my 212 cab.
After trying the Ninja head in a shop I noticed a difference in tone between the two. The Ninja tone seemed cleaner to me. I really liked it more.
Also I tend to like not having to set my master volume beyond 12 o'clock and since I've been using my LMIII with my new Ninja 212 cab (300 watts "only") l've noticed that I often have to set my master beyond 12 o'clock.
So I was thinking that maybe with the 500 watts @ 8 Ohm from the Ninja head that would be less the case.
What are your thoughts about it?
Thanks and in advance.
Apart from the 'overkill' factor as far as loudness is concerned and the fact that that much power would never be necessary nowadays, could you guys name me advantages of having/running a 1000-watt head?
The head I'm thinking of is a Little Mark Ninja. I would mainly run it into a 212 Ninja cab (8 Ohm) rated at 800W as occasionally into a 4 Ohm 410 HF Markbass cab.
I currently own a LMIII (300 watts @ 8 Ohm) that I mainly used with my 212 cab.
After trying the Ninja head in a shop I noticed a difference in tone between the two. The Ninja tone seemed cleaner to me. I really liked it more.
Also I tend to like not having to set my master volume beyond 12 o'clock and since I've been using my LMIII with my new Ninja 212 cab (300 watts "only") l've noticed that I often have to set my master beyond 12 o'clock.
So I was thinking that maybe with the 500 watts @ 8 Ohm from the Ninja head that would be less the case.
What are your thoughts about it?
Thanks and in advance.