• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

124 vs OFPF: Part Doh

Well I don't understand why you guys are using shifts and awkwards fingerings while I can play the whole thing in one position...

Of course that's possible, and maybe marginally easier, but as I alluded to earlier, I preferred the tonal balance when playing the first D and long C on the 3rd string and the the G's on 2nd compared to the 4th/3rd respectively. I've seen nothing awkward or remotely difficult thus far.
In the end, the choice would also depend somewhat in what came next. If it was a low G, for example...
 
Of course that's possible, and maybe marginally easier, but as I alluded to earlier, I preferred the tonal balance when playing the first D and long C on the 3rd string and the the G's on 2nd compared to the 4th/3rd respectively. I've seen nothing awkward or remotely difficult thus far.
In the end, the choice would also depend somewhat in what came next. If it was a low G, for example...
To me the less shifts you make in general will have a much better result in sound, fret noise, length of notes, phrasing and timing but YMMV.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Whousedtoplay
To me the less shifts you make in general will have a much better result in sound, length of notes, phrasing and timing but YMMV.

That depends. As far as possible I aim to make smaller shifts of the hand whilst notes are sounding, so there are no interruptions due to shifting. I will even switch stopping fingers mid-note to facilitate a seamless shift, if necessary.

I think if shifting impacts timing or phrasing then shifting needs more work.
 
Last edited:
That is the aspect that should be worked on all the time ;-)

Indeed. Unfortunately for many bass players, shifting is (or at least used to be) a bit of a bogey-man. Looking back to when I was learning to play - pre-internet - I put it down to the number of beginner to intermediate books that focussed on box-scale patterns in position.
 
the less shifts you make in general will have a much better result in sound

Yes, but could you avoid those shifts (ever) especially on the 4-string bass?
No.
If so, one must learn it.
The OP's example is not(!) a serious passage. Usually, aspiring bass players encounter and/or face more challenging shifts - that's a result of maturing as a musician.

I remember as a teenager many decades ago, I was learning to drive a car with a manual transmission - a stick shift. I used to make me mad to stop - shift gears - for pedestrians, for Stop signs, for Red lights, etc...
I've learned that "it comes with the territory".
 
Yes, but could you avoid those shifts (ever) especially on the 4-string bass?
No.
If so, one must learn it.
The OP's example is not(!) a serious passage. Usually, aspiring bass players encounter and/or face more challenging shifts - that's a result of maturing as a musician.

I remember as a teenager many decades ago, I was learning to drive a car with a manual transmission - a stick shift. I used to make me mad to stop - shift gears - for pedestrians, for Stop signs, for Red lights, etc...
I've learned that "it comes with the territory".
Yes I agree that shifts should be worked on. I wrote a bunch of exercices on that matter but like I said before the whole passage posted by the OP is easily done in one position using OFPF.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Whousedtoplay
Yes I agree that shifts should be worked on. I wrote a bunch of exercices on that matter but like I said before the whole passage posted by the OP is easily done in one position using OFPF.

I have to say that I don't really care too much for the term OFPF. In the literal sense in which most people use it, I find it over-prescriptive and even a bit cheesy, bordering on bass-player jargon.

In the example given, playing literally OFPF is not quite possible, since the Eb requires either a forwards extension to 11 on 4th string with pinky or a backwards extension to 6 on 3rd string with Index.

I much prefer the more general term 'In Position', which includes the extensions as valid and essential techniques that are clearly not shifts. So:
No shifts? Yes.
In Position? IMHO, yes.
But OFPF? That depends if the definition includes/allows for the extensions, and for that I don't think there is yet a definitive answer. But by the literal definition, no.

YMMV
 
I have to say that I don't really care too much for the term OFPF. In the literal sense in which most people use it, I find it over-prescriptive and even a bit cheesy, bordering on bass-player jargon.

In the example given, playing literally OFPF is not quite possible, since the Eb requires either a forwards extension to 11 on 4th string with pinky or a backwards extension to 6 on 3rd string with Index.

I much prefer the more general term 'In Position', which includes the extensions as valid and essential techniques that are clearly not shifts. So:
No shifts? Yes.
In Position? IMHO, yes.
But OFPF? That depends if the definition includes/allows for the extensions, and for that I don't think there is yet a definitive answer. But by the literal definition, no.

YMMV
I know what you mean. I've used the OFPF abbreviation because it was used in the thread. Since I played a lot of jazz lines in my career it was useful to make good use of the 4 fingers-4 frets+ and learn out to slide in-and-out of a position just like that Eb at end of the example ;)
 
I never have all fingers down at the same time.
I was just watching Hadrien's video.

hf.PNG


hf2.PNG

From here.