I have to say that I don't really care too much for the term OFPF. In the literal sense in which most people use it, I find it over-prescriptive and even a bit cheesy, bordering on bass-player jargon.
In the example given, playing literally OFPF is not quite possible, since the Eb requires either a forwards extension to 11 on 4th string with pinky or a backwards extension to 6 on 3rd string with Index.
I much prefer the more general term 'In Position', which includes the extensions as valid and essential techniques that are clearly not shifts. So:
No shifts? Yes.
In Position? IMHO, yes.
But OFPF? That depends if the definition includes/allows for the extensions, and for that I don't think there is yet a definitive answer. But by the literal definition, no.
YMMV