• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

1961 and 1962 precision basses.

I made a clip comparing my basses.
Which one do you like best and why?


I must say, you play extremely well.

I preferred the sound of the '62 with the thomastik flats. It has a fuller sound.

The '61 sounded a little 'hollow' but I believe this to be the strings, not the bass.

As a general comment, neither has the trademark sound I'm used to hearing from P basses of this vintage. To my ears they sounded a little more jazz-bass like, as in both pickups on with the tone rolled off. That's not to say they don't sound good - they sound very good - just not quite what I was expecting.

Again, superb playing. :)
 
Last edited:
I must say, you play extremely well.

I preferred the sound of the '62 with the thomastik flats.

The '61 sounded a little 'hollow' but I believe this to be the strings, not the bass.

As a general comment, neither had the trademark sound I'm used to hearing from P basses of this vintage. To my ear they sounded a little more jazz-bass like, as in both pickups on with tone rolled off. That's not to say they don't sound good - they sound very good - just not quite what I was expecting.

Again, superb playing. :)
Thank you!
Perhaps it’s the way I play and how I made the sound in the QC it reminds you of a jazz.
I mostly play a jazz indeed.
 
Thank you!
Perhaps it’s the way I play and how I made the sound in the QC it reminds you of a jazz.
I mostly play a jazz indeed.
Yes, I think you're right. When 8ths and 16ths are played staccato, the tonal character of the bass does not come to it's fullest expression because of the sharp attack/stop to the note. Perhaps with whole, 1/2 and 1/4 notes, I'd be able to pick the signature P bass sound a little better.
 
Last edited:
Both sound phenomenal to me. Great tone. I'm leaning to the 61 but I can't articulate really why....maybe a little meatier and full frequency. The 62 is a bit grindier and slightly more compressed sounding...which don't get me wrong, I love that tone as well. But you asked. Enjoyed the video very much.
 
  • Like
Reactions: roogbass
Damn dude... you are channeling Pino for real!!!! OUTSTANDING!

I'm on team 61' with Fender flats. Don't really have any wise rationale as to my decision, as I don't speak technical very well lol. It just peaks my ear nostrils a little more.

I would however be interested to hear if there were differences in tone by switching the strings on each. Just wondering if the thomastiks would make the 61' sound even better or not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: roogbass
Great playing! I prefer the 61 slightly - the attack and tone is amazing on both and I'm really struggling to say why. I assume these are slightly older Fender flats? Those are my favourite strings when they were still in production, so I suspect it might just come down to the tone of the string and the tension and how it effects playing. Great video and amazing playing.
 

Latest posts