• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

1961 and 1962 precision basses.

Both great basses, great playing, maybe not a fair fight putting Fender flats up against Thomastiks.
I never cared much for Fender flats but have to say, you make them sound good enough to make me a believer.
I think a producer would go with the 61 but a bassist would be drawn to the greater low end complexity of the 62 with the Thomastiks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: roogbass
So, they both sound great. (so do you!)
I might slightly favor the '61 but no clear winner here.
I'd ask which one one plays better?
The 62 is the lighter player, flatter neck.
The 61 needs a bit more digging in, but it seems the most persons like its sound a bit better.
That’s not only because of the strings.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SJan3
The 62 is the lighter player, flatter neck.
The 61 needs a bit more digging in, but it seems the most persons like its sound a bit better.
That’s not only because of the strings.
Well, you seemed to have no trouble getting around either. Maybe consider a set of nickel rounds for one? I have DR SUNBEAMS on one of my P basses and LaBella Low Tension Flexible Flats on the other. Both strings are easy on the hand and sound great, IMHO, after broken in. Just a thought as your basses sound so similar as they sit. There are slight differences but nothing the audience would ever hear.
Either way, you play beautifully and I'm sure you'd make any instrument sound good!
There's a poem entitled, "the Touch of the Master's Hand". Read it if you get a chance. You'll get the point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: roogbass
The 62 is the lighter player, flatter neck.
The 61 needs a bit more digging in, but it seems the most persons like its sound a bit better.
That’s not only because of the strings.
They both sound good, it’s hard to qualify recordings over the internet versus how they sound live and in person, but I thought the 61 with the Fender flats had a little more clarity. In person I might prefer the 62 with TIs. But neither is the wrong choice! :thumbsup:
 
  • Like
Reactions: roogbass
Well, you seemed to have no trouble getting around either. Maybe consider a set of nickel rounds for one? I have DR SUNBEAMS on one of my P basses and LaBella Low Tension Flexible Flats on the other. Both strings are easy on the hand and sound great, IMHO, after broken in. Just a thought as your basses sound so similar as they sit. There are slight differences but nothing the audience would ever hear.
Either way, you play beautifully and I'm sure you'd make any instrument sound good!
There's a poem entitled, "the Touch of the Master's Hand". Read it if you get a chance. You'll get the point.

thank you! I will make note of the strings you mention. :-)
 
  • Like
Reactions: SJan3