True, but buying and returning a new bass is much easier than dealing with shipping an expensive vintage bass back and forth.I'd say it applies to new instruments too. No two pieces of wood are the same.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
True, but buying and returning a new bass is much easier than dealing with shipping an expensive vintage bass back and forth.I'd say it applies to new instruments too. No two pieces of wood are the same.
I'm very much against this thing with returning bought items that there is nothing wrong with.True, but buying and returning a new bass is much easier than dealing with shipping an expensive vintage bass back and forth.
Yes it was. 70's Fenders were why "pre-cbs" Fenders were in such demand. I was a gigging bass player all thru the 70's, and we all knew this. The pickups were good. The rest of the instrument, not so much. Things got a lot better around '82-'84 or so.73 and forward was a tough era for Fender quality
$2,999kinda already been said, but having been there in person for the 70's Fender production issues, it felt like you had to play quite a few of them to find any gems.
The 70's were very hit or miss for Fender basses.
So I'm not at all surprised that you were not impressed by one. Bet the price was kinda silly too!
I had a 71 sunburst which was heavy with a totally dead E string no matter what I did to it and across the board sounded dull. My SQ VM P bass is a far superior instrument in every aspect. There again I had 75 ash P bass which was a nice bass and I should have kept it.73 and forward was a tough era for Fender quality
The bass has seen a lot of use and maybe I was not eq’ing the MarkBass amp properly, but this bass did not have any sort of tonal mojo.
The funny thing is that this GC had a heavy ash 1974 Jazz with the original pickups covers that clearly had that tone. It was either cheaper or the same price as the dud.
Agree here. I've only played a couple 'vintage' Jazz basses - a '66 and a mid-'70s. The '66 felt great, but I was playing it unplugged so can't comment on the tone. My guitarist has a mid-70s Jazz (not sure of the year, but it's a 4-bolt neck) that is naturally worn in (i.e., a true 'relic'), and I've played it a few times, and I'd take my 2020 G&L Jazz over it all day, every day. It's not that its terrible or anything, but my G&L feels more solid and sounds better, and is easier to play (for me) because it has a 12" radius vs the 7.25". Just because it's vintage doesn't mean it's full of mojo and fantastic.I'm probably in the minority here, but I'd rather have a 2025 USA Standard Jazz bass... than any J bass from the 60's or 70's.
Yeah, is it worth the risk?I’m sure a setup and strings would help, but I’m not sure how much.
I firmly believe that the best stuff is being produced right now.I'm probably in the minority here, but I'd rather have a 2025 USA Standard Jazz bass... than any J bass from the 60's or 70's.

Well there ya' go. Two years too late and a dollar or two short. Damn.Dad had a 74 Plymouth Duster that was dog mess and boobies at the same time. It was neglected all kinds of ways and ran like a top.
This is true! I had a 1972 Jazz Bass that I grew not to be particularly impressed with either. I ended up trading it for my 2022 Rickenbacker 4003 that I still have. I'm grateful that I made that trade. The man who I traded with wanted a vintage Jazz Bass and those tones while I was GAS-ing for his Ric.The 70's were very hit or miss for Fender basses.