• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

1x15/2x8 carvin cab?

is it this?:
634183468236109130.jpg


If so, interesting...looks like it is of the RL series, but I never heard of it....
 
You bet. The cab is designed for the RL600 head, which is a stereo amp which is capable of bi-amping or full range.

One thing I used to do was bridge the Carvin head into just the 15 for a clean signal, and use a seperate head for the 8's with a little grit. Worked great that way.
 
I like having the option of bi-wiring, because I can use a small two channels amp for the highs, and a more powerful amp for the lows. But, I've only ever done it with PA gear; never tried it with a bass rig.

A lot of bass players have been wanking up the term bi-amping for a long time now, to the general confusion of many others. And now bi-wiring which is a scurrilous concept at best is getting misused in MI circles too? Why muddy the waters further? Read up:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bi-wiring

What you have described above is bi-amping.
 
You bet. The cab is designed for the RL600 head, which is a stereo amp which is capable of bi-amping or full range. ...

The R1015 models were paired with the R1000 head, the RL6815 were with the R600.


Yeah that's what I was getting at, sorta. The speakers are wired seperately and I believe the 8's are a 4 ohm load and the 15 is a 4 ohm load. So, if I'm correct, either a 2 ohm stable amp or a stereo amp will be required.

Actually, I believe the 2x8+tweet are an 8 ohm load, and the 15 is a 4 ohm load.

The cab actually sounds pretty good when biamped, although as Greenboy stated, the layout of the midrange drivers has some dispersion issues. I tend to gig with my Cyclops combo, even though its heavy and doesn't sound as good as my Demeter into my Acme's or my fEarful, because its loud and I don't really care if it gets messed up.
 
A lot of bass players have been wanking up the term bi-amping for a long time now, to the general confusion of many others. And now bi-wiring which is a scurrilous concept at best is getting misused in MI circles too? Why muddy the waters further? Read up:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bi-wiring

What you have described above is bi-amping.

My bad. I know the difference. Cranial flatulence.
 
The non-vertical 8" drivers are kinda spacehog wasted dispersion - one good 8" driver could have done the job much better, or two average drivers but set vertical... Still, the ol' Cyclops airhead cab would be great with a BX1200 or BX1500 slid in.

Hey, greenboy, this issue could be addressed by turning the cab on its side, couldn't it? I ask because there's one available in my area as well, also sans amp, and I've been thinking about snatching it up to be run in this fashion.
 
Hey barebones,

Yeah, that's possibly better out in the audience though it's awful close to the floor and reflections and blockage could make it not so, and it's kind of favoring the ears in your knees if you play anywhere close to your cab - rather than the ones in your head. And if stage space is sometimes at a premium that's not going to work out... I gigged a lot of years with an Ampeg 1832 Extreme (18", two 10", two 6") and it had the same problem (as do 410 cabs).


PR1832HE.jpg



The best solution I found was to place 1"-thick open-cell foam behind the grill on just one side, so that it covered one of the 6" drivers and the 10" driver below it, with some cut space around the tweet. This cab was really bright so it didn't hurt to knock down the upper midrange output anyway. Maybe that'd work for you with 1" gray foam over one of the 8"s.