• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

24 inch scale strings help

30" scale will work. You may need to undo some of the winding on the tuner end of the string. I used a set of 30" strings on a Strat bass I set up. I unwound the top layer of the E and A strings so that they would fit in the Strat tuners. Unwind only the amount needed and snip it off. I used heat shrink tubing to secure the windings.

How is this working out for you? Any string buzz or loss of tone?
 
the d and g are fine. the low e is the problem. it's real floppy and doesn't hold tuning well because of the lack of tension. plus the low e was so thick I had to try and cram it in the post and I think it's slipping.

Exactly why you need to start with a short-scale string set, and somehow trim it so that the thick (speaking-length) part is not wrapped around the tuning post.

There is a lot involved in making strings work.

My original plan was to solder the over-wrap just below the trim point, and leave about 2.5" of core for the post.
 
I had a idea that if I made it a string through body and added ferrules, that would give me almost 5 inches more string length. I could reposition the tailpiece to cover up the string through and the bass would look almost the same and not loose it's stock look.
 
I had a idea that if I made it a string through body and added ferrules, that would give me almost 5 inches more string length. I could reposition the tailpiece to cover up the string through and the bass would look almost the same and not loose it's stock look.

I thought about that too. Unfortunately, you will only realistically be taking up an inch and a half.

30" scale strings measure 32" from ball to taper, leaving 4" extra over the 28" tail-piece position.

My tail-piece design places the ball-end at (around) the bottom/back, taking up all 4 inch's of slack.
 
George Mann said:
I thought about that too. Unfortunately, you will only realistically be taking up an inch and a half.

30" scale strings measure 32" from ball to taper, leaving 4" extra over the 28" tail-piece position.

My tail-piece design places the ball-end at (around) the bottom/back, taking up all 4 inch's of slack.

it might be just enough though, right?
 
I thought about that too. Unfortunately, you will only realistically be taking up an inch and a half.

30" scale strings measure 32" from ball to taper, leaving 4" extra over the 28" tail-piece position.

My tail-piece design places the ball-end at (around) the bottom/back, taking up all 4 inch's of slack.

I need to correct this post by saying that the ball to nut distance is 26", and 27 5/8" from ball to bottom of tuner.

27" is the perfect length for the E-string with 3 inches of core.
 
Sorry for reopening a dead post, but I bought a 24 inch scale length bass neck this year and looks to be a dead ringer for your Teisco bass. You saved me so much unneeded research in figuring out where it was from! (Though mine is undrilled so maybe it's a reproduction someone did.)

To contribute to the topic at hand, I bought a 5 string bass set of strings and planned on using the heavier 4 strings. (45-65-85-105-135)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zach77