Everyone should have at least one Stingray. They'll do a sound nothing else quite replicates.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I saw those today - a P & a PJ - really? That's the big news for 2016? Me no like.EBMM is also introducing 2 new passive basses to their instrument roster!View attachment 778454 View attachment 778455
What an unbelievable amount of whining, bitching and criticizing going on here. I am disappointed to see the lack of support for one of the greatest bass manufacturers ever...but not at all surprised.
With the new 40th anniversary model they are paying homage to the prototype of the flagship of their product line and it looks great. It has elements of the original with some benefits of some of their advancements.
The new basses do indeed follow some basic formulas but are bound to have the quality fit and finish as well as playability and reliability Music Man is known for. They deserve to have a piece of the pie for these designs more than many of the imitators that are constantly lauded for their Fender-esque designs that are much less subtle in their impression of the classics.
To look at their current offerings, I would say that it is diverse as ever. What a dramatic improvement to the website too!
I say kudos to Music Man for making some tough decisions to cut the fat from their product line and introduce some new stuff that they surely believe will improve their sales.
Why? That would not be in keeping with their intent to follow the aesthetic of the original "Old Smoothie".They should have gone with a figured wood pick guard.
Everyone should have at least one Stingray. They'll do a sound nothing else quite replicates.
View attachment 778840
With that in mind,
why hate on them for making their version of already consecrated basses?
Because EBMM have been so outspokenly critical of the entire industry for doing exactly the same thing. Sterling Ball himself declared it was his mission to move the bass world past 1954. It would appear he has given up on that mission completely. That is why people are disappointed.
Truth!!!
To be fair, he probably should have said 1957.Because EBMM have been so outspokenly critical of the entire industry for doing exactly the same thing. Sterling Ball himself declared it was his mission to move the bass world past 1954. It would appear he has given up on that mission completely. That is why people are disappointed.
Because EBMM have been so outspokenly critical of the entire industry for doing exactly the same thing. Sterling Ball himself declared it was his mission to move the bass world past 1954. It would appear he has given up on that mission completely. That is why people are disappointed.