- Mar 11, 2005
- 2,541
- 7
- 41
- Disclosures
- Employee - Basscentre Melbourne
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
By this you mean the S2 sounds louder to you than the S1? If so, with my UL310's, I've had opposite results... mainly due to that mid peak on the S1's.
I also don't think you've checked out my wenge MTD yet...![]()
Thanks Ken
Cool that you are doing what we others wouldn't be able to!
You think that S2 would better with Walter Woods amp?
-Christian
Lemme know when the hang is.
I may have something new to bring to the party![]()
Hey Ken, you get to try a UL502 yet?![]()
I would think he would prefer a UL902C ....![]()
Hey Ken, you get to try a UL502 yet?![]()
No, actually relatively subtle, but you can hear it. The S2 still does not have the low mid oomph of your SA410, and still has a much bigger, wider low end. However, the upper mids that some don't care for have been somewhat attenuated on the 410S2. So, I'm with Gary on his earlier comments.... if you liked the S1, you will like the S2... in some cases and with some heads, maybe better. If you thought the S1 had a little too much upper mid presence, but in general liked the cab, the S2 might be different enough that it would work for you. If the S1 was really not your thing, IMO, the S2 is more similar than different... it's still quite articulate, big, and to my ear, actually more 'modern' sounding than the S1, which was capable of quite a bit of mid growl and aggression to my ear.
My guess is, from our previous discussions, you would like the S2 better than the S1 that you had, but not as much as your SA410!
+1
No offense to Big String, whom I like very much, but a $2400 stereo amp that can't go below 4 ohms per side just doesn't make a lot of sense to me. Too limiting for cab configs for all that power... especially since you could get a lightweight stereo power amp and a Quest II preamp for a LOT less money... maybe closer to like 1/2. IMHO, Epifani kinda' dropped the ball on that one.
+1
No offense to Big String, whom I like very much, but a $2400 stereo amp that can't go below 4 ohms per side just doesn't make a lot of sense to me. Too limiting for cab configs for all that power... especially since you could get a lightweight stereo power amp and a Quest II preamp for a LOT less money... maybe closer to like 1/2. IMHO, Epifani kinda' dropped the ball on that one.
... mine is reduced nicely. You of all people would probably love this amp X. If you want to talk pm me.
Excellent... thanks, Ken. I still owe you a comparison of the SA410/HS410/HS210 cabs... I'll post it as soon as it happens!
I still owe you a comparison of the SA410/HS410/HS210 cabs... I'll post it as soon as it happens!
Man, I had an opportunity to hear the HS410 and HS210 at Bass Emporium last Friday.![]()
![]()
![]()
And thanks for the great review, Ken! Now, I am dying to hear the HS410 and UL410 Series 2 side by side!![]()
That being said, if you really want to use two 310UL's with a monoblock head, your are very limited. I would guess, though, that this is an unusual enough situation to not provide manufacturers with much profit incentive.