• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

A-A-D-G tuning - what strings?

More alternate tuning idiocy.

I've recently learned that when playing "Rock and Roll, Part 2" by Gary Glitter, the guitar is tuned with every string is tuned to an A.

There's a reason that standard tuning evolved. We need to be musicians and play the instrument. Instead of letting untalented "musos" dictate something unnecessary and, IMO, stupid.

"But it just sounds HEAVIER, man!" :banghead:
 
More alternate tuning idiocy.

I've recently learned that when playing "Rock and Roll, Part 2" by Gary Glitter, the guitar is tuned with every string is tuned to an A.

There's a reason that standard tuning evolved. We need to be musicians and play the instrument. Instead of letting untalented "musos" dictate something unnecessary and, IMO, stupid.

"But it just sounds HEAVIER, man!" :banghead:

Not sure your soap box is tall enough.
 
More alternate tuning idiocy.

I've recently learned that when playing "Rock and Roll, Part 2" by Gary Glitter, the guitar is tuned with every string is tuned to an A.

There's a reason that standard tuning evolved. We need to be musicians and play the instrument. Instead of letting untalented "musos" dictate something unnecessary and, IMO, stupid.

"But it just sounds HEAVIER, man!" :banghead:

Yes, God forbid people using alternate tunings to be able to play stuff they weren't before with standard tuning, like the folk musicians that tune their guitars DADGAD. :bored:

And don't get me started about cello players, what idiot would tune their instrument in fifths. :mad:

Cello players have obvious been wrong all along, why do they refuse to adhere to STANDARD tuning, they think they are special or something conceited along those lines, damn those smug cellists and their special tuning needs! :rage:

Adhere to the norm that I define goddamnit! :poop:

o_O

... :banghead:

Indeed! :rolleyes:

It's called standard tuning for the reason that there are in fact other alternatives to it, otherwise it would just be called tuning.

You might consider sticking to a one string washtub bass in the future, seems like you got issues with having too many options.
 
Last edited:
More alternate tuning idiocy.

I've recently learned that when playing "Rock and Roll, Part 2" by Gary Glitter, the guitar is tuned with every string is tuned to an A.

There's a reason that standard tuning evolved. We need to be musicians and play the instrument. Instead of letting untalented "musos" dictate something unnecessary and, IMO, stupid.

"But it just sounds HEAVIER, man!" :banghead:
Dude, are you okay?
 
What is the OP wanting in the way of feel? Does the OP wants that super low A string to feel like the A string above it on a standard light gauge set? I'm not going into all the math, all the discussion, and don't feed me all of the b###s### about inner winding techniques causing differences in tension, etc. I can tell you more about than than you can tell me. That said, read on.

There are two approaches.

1) ROUGHLY SPEAKING, double the diameter for an octave down version of the string, then experiment a gauge or two either way to get the desired feel. So, if a regular conventional round wound A is @ .080 diameter, start with getting a string of the same make and model in a .160 diameter string. D'Addario has an XL single in .160 for about $10 street price.

2) Again, ROUGHLY SPEAKING, the practical progression on the low string is about 5 thou per fret, or half step. Since a B string is usually @ .130 or .135, then add 10 thou, 5 thou per note (Bb-A) and you get to about the same place: @ .140 to a .145. GHS does make a stainless .138 in a single, contact Jon Moody to order; D'Addario makes an XL .145 for about $8-10 street price.

And of course, if the OP wants a different feel, then adjust accordingly.
 
Last edited: