• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

A new ‘Peg for smaller gigs and practice

What would be the most noticeable difference between the 210AV and the PF112hlf? Volume? Tone? Both? Also would the PF210HE be a good choice for the PF-50T. I’ve read the PF-50T does not fit on the 210AV.

I’m trying to decide between the SVT210AV and the PF112HLF to pair with a PF350. I’m not attached to any speaker configuration; just trying to figure out which is more practical for small to medium sized gigs. I used a single 112 for years with good results, but I’m wondering if I’ll be missing some volume versus the 210, which also happens to be a few pounds lighter.
 
I’m trying to decide between the SVT210AV and the PF112HLF to pair with a PF350. I’m not attached to any speaker configuration; just trying to figure out which is more practical for small to medium sized gigs. I used a single 112 for years with good results, but I’m wondering if I’ll be missing some volume versus the 210, which also happens to be a few pounds lighter.
Maybe a little but I don't think it's a particularly significant amount.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lionstrings