I'll say this, the real loser here is the poor builder who is apparently going to have to put a third neck on this bass under warranty :scowl:
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I disagree. The old school caveat emptor conventions change when the buyer has no opportunity to handle the item prior to purchase.
Internet seller responsibility is to clearly disclose all defects in the ad. Also, it is seller responsibility (and risk) to make sure the stated condition is upon receipt by the buyer. The seller must be held responsible for properly packing, tracking and insuring because they are the party in direct control of those protections.
Also, in the case of undisclosed defects, it should be the buyer’s decision whether to return or repair. This is because the buyer did not intend to buy a repaired, broken bass; and shouldn’t be forced to do so.
Also, because undisclosed defects are a seller default, the seller should be responsible for reimbursing the return shipment cost to the buyer. Otherwise, the buyer is forced to pay a penalty for a seller’s inaccurate ad. This is also in line with product return conventions for mail order companies.
As far as I know, my thoughts are in line with eBay rules. Like them or not, eBay has had plenty of time to figure out a working protocol for internet sales of used items. Furthermore, eBay rules carry authority outside of eBay because they are so dominant in the used product industry.
king_biscuit said:That's fine, but those items are not housed in delicate wooden chassis. Shipping damage that could damage electronics inside of a bass guitar cavity would do major damage to the bass.
I look at it like this: It's a used bass, so it's bound to have some player wear, etc. If you want a minty, new bass, then buy a new bass. HOWEVER... the player wear/defects should be disclosed as accurately as possible by the seller so the buyer can make an educated decision whether to purchase or not, and avoid outcomes such as this.
IF the bass is recieved by the purchaser with any undisclosed issues, even during shipping, they should be given a full refund(perhaps minus shipping costs) immediately after returning the bass back to the seller. Then, the seller should be responsible for repairs, claims, relisting, etc. It only took the buyer 2 days to figure out that he didn't get what he payed for, which is a very reasonable time.
It's simply, the "right" thing to do.
A pain in the rump, yes. But, anything less is just plain selfishness. The buyer deserves to recieve the item that he/she paid for. It's not as if he just tried it and decided that it's not his "flavor". He's got a legitimate complaint. This is, of course, just IMHO.
king_biscuit said:I'll say this, the real loser here is the poor builder who is apparently going to have to put a third neck on this bass under warranty :scowl:
I'm so disappointed. I was getting ready to leave the shop tonight but was told to check this thread out first. I'm really upset, because I was planning to fill out my application and submit my portfolio to a local University in an effort to major in photography so I could meticulously detail all of the builds at my shop. I was going to minor in run-on sentences. It took me so long to read this thread that I missed the deadline. Now I will have to continue concentrating on building basses instead of documenting them.
All kidding aside: This has been an informative thread. I've known the seller for years and believe him to be an honest guy with integrity. The buyer's standpoint is totally justified as well. I'm privy to information on both sides that have not been presented here and would like to think that this is all a matter of simple miss-communication. I agreed yesterday to evaluate and repair/replace any defective components of the instrument simply because I have the audacity to believe in what I do. It may be "out of warranty" but if something is wrong I want to see it, address it, and learn from it.
Both parties contacted the shop yesterday and I thought it was resolved. If you kids want to continue arguing about this please feel free. From where I stand, there's a CallowHill on the chopping block and we take care of what we make. Bicker on, in the meantime I just want the seller and buyer to know that we here at CallowHill love you both.
Isn't there a "post your basses with pets" thread you guys can "R Kelly" on?
Trying to keep it light-hearted. Be well. -Tim
Ever play a brand new bass in a store with knobs or switches that don't work? They weren't bad when they put them in.
callowhill said:I'm so disappointed. I was getting ready to leave the shop tonight but was told to check this thread out first. I'm really upset, because I was planning to fill out my application and submit my portfolio to a local University in an effort to major in photography so I could meticulously detail all of the builds at my shop. I was going to minor in run-on sentences. It took me so long to read this thread that I missed the deadline. Now I will have to continue concentrating on building basses instead of documenting them.
All kidding aside: This has been an informative thread. I've known the seller for years and believe him to be an honest guy with integrity. The buyer's standpoint is totally justified as well. I'm privy to information on both sides that have not been presented here and would like to think that this is all a matter of simple miss-communication. I agreed yesterday to evaluate and repair/replace any defective components of the instrument simply because I have the audacity to believe in what I do. It may be "out of warranty" but if something is wrong I want to see it, address it, and learn from it.
Both parties contacted the shop yesterday and I thought it was resolved. If you kids want to continue arguing about this please feel free. From where I stand, there's a CallowHill on the chopping block and we take care of what we make. Bicker on, in the meantime I just want the seller and buyer to know that we here at CallowHill love you both.
Isn't there a "post your basses with pets" thread you guys can "R Kelly" on?
Trying to keep it light-hearted. Be well. -Tim
Tim / Callowhill rocks!
king_biscuit said:All we know is it isn't in the same shape as it was shipped,and it was covered for 1000$ in damages. A refund isn't on the table, and the mfr. Is offering to make the bass better than new, for free. And still no damage claim filed. Tick ..tick....I personally would be thinking about the custom inlays I wanted for the new neck on my better than I bought it in condition bass. And what I could upgrade with the one money. Sounds like a pretty good windfall to me.
king_biscuit said:Uhh, some of them do. I worked in a music store for 10 years while in college/grad school, and I saw stuff come through that was clearly built wrong at the factory -- including a brand new Le Paul Custom with the switch wired backwards.
I fixed it for you.
/thread.

callowhill said:Isn't there a "post your basses with pets" thread you guys can "R Kelly" on?
If by posting a thinly veiled condescending rant scolding the very people obsessed enough with basses to purchase high dollar boutique instruments rocks, then yes, he rocks![]()
king_biscuit said:Hey, man, that was not my post you quoted.![]()
Sure it was! Lol
I'm so disappointed. I was getting ready to leave the shop tonight but was told to check this thread out first. I'm really upset, because I was planning to fill out my application and submit my portfolio to a local University in an effort to major in photography so I could meticulously detail all of the builds at my shop. I was going to minor in run-on sentences. It took me so long to read this thread that I missed the deadline. Now I will have to continue concentrating on building basses instead of documenting them.
All kidding aside: This has been an informative thread. I've known the seller for years and believe him to be an honest guy with integrity. The buyer's standpoint is totally justified as well. I'm privy to information on both sides that have not been presented here and would like to think that this is all a matter of simple miss-communication. I agreed yesterday to evaluate and repair/replace any defective components of the instrument simply because I have the audacity to believe in what I do. It may be "out of warranty" but if something is wrong I want to see it, address it, and learn from it.
Both parties contacted the shop yesterday and I thought it was resolved. If you kids want to continue arguing about this please feel free. From where I stand, there's a CallowHill on the chopping block and we take care of what we make. Bicker on, in the meantime I just want the seller and buyer to know that we here at CallowHill love you both.
Isn't there a "post your basses with pets" thread you guys can "R Kelly" on?
Trying to keep it light-hearted. Be well. -Tim
king_biscuit said:Check post 186. Though for some reason you have my name on it.