Oh, I have neither, but.......Yours is the 1964-65 Cougar made by Crucianelli. Here is the 1966-67 Eko-made version:
View attachment 4645067
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Oh, I have neither, but.......Yours is the 1964-65 Cougar made by Crucianelli. Here is the 1966-67 Eko-made version:
View attachment 4645067
Ah...
My first thought was obviously Mrs Robinson. The second was bourbon. I don't think there was a third.
In this thread, I hope to discuss things on a strictly visual level. It's not about what feels good to play or what things sound like. Strictly eye candy, dig?
The thing that made me start thinking about this is the giant tuners on my new bass. They're full size fender-style clovers, and I think they look ridiculous... Like clown shoes on tiny feet.
I went looking for fender-style headstocks with mini clovers and couldn't find any, which got me wondering about how it would look and why we don't see this often. On square(ish) headstocks, like the Gibson LP Jr for example, they're readily found but not so much on other shapes. What's up with that?
The next item on my list is chrome knurled knobs. Honestly, I think they're terribly ugly and they stick out in a weird way. Black ones are much nicer on my eyes and usually match the pickups and pickguard (if there is one) much better.
Finally, a white nut on an otherwise all black bass as well as its opposite. Both just bug me. It breaks the flow of the colour scheme. I suppose some ppl want it for that very reason but it's not for me.
So. Thoughts? Opinions? What are your aesthetic bugaboos, and why?
No offense taken at any point, just to be perfectly clearI think there's a difference between saying "your ATK is ugly" and "I don't like ATK headstocks". One is specific, the other is general.
I used the ATK example because of your avatar RR. I'd love one, they just never show up locally when I have any spare cash.
so I ordered that bass even though I didn't care for the looks (almost because I didn't) at the time because I thought the features sounded promising. After growing up a bit, I admitted to myself that looks do in fact matter to me and tried going in a few different directions with gear; and now that the dust has settled, guess what? My preferences have landed almost exactly where they started: P/Js, ATKs, and old Peaveys 
Excellent. I may not have been clear enough, but I like them, I was just using the first confected example that came to mind.No offense taken at any point, just to be perfectly clear
While I generally like the hippie sammich just fine on actual neck-through instruments, I can't stand hippie sammich in the front with bolts in the back. It just seems like a lieOne "look" I can't abide is a beautiful top interrupted by a lengthwise skunk stripe on so-called neck-through basses.
We have to be related in some way.I have a thing for" not your average looking basses"The blue skinny one is fascinating.How's it play? The 8 string's to die for,all in all a beautiful collection.Or, in other words, these basses all live together in my bedroom:
View attachment 4644312 View attachment 4644313 View attachment 4644314 View attachment 4644315View attachment 4644316
Which are weird, which are beautiful? I dare ya! hehe![]()

. Give me some like what Dusty or Sting would play anytime!That made me laugh. I love their basses, but some of the designs leave me shaking my head, especially some of the COTM jobs. It would be interesting see the reaction if you described them like this on the Alembic forum.
I think for the reasons I mentioned in my previous post; tradition. I can imagine the reaction by some if it were, say, pink. Seriously, even if it were red to match a particular aesthetic for that bass, some would be upset.
You'd probably be OK if you were an owner, otherwise I think, they'd think you were just being insulting.Yeah, somehow I don't think I'd be greeted warmly by that bunch if I went in talking about "moldy amoebas"
Not me I'm afraid. I've never seen one with a butt cut I like yet. Plus it move the bridge too far to the fretting hand side making first position a longer reach.I'd even consider an Alembic like this one:
They're beautiful.And I absolutely love these Alphers
It's never OK to go tort (thinking of a line from Clerks II). We will have to stage an intervention if you do.I never trade off with tort.
Reminds me of just about every job I've ever had where the shiny bums get to call the shots and not the engineering staff.That reminded me of a quote from my line of work: "100 years of tradition, unimpeded by progress."
The G&L moustache
I think there's a difference between saying "your ATK is ugly" and "I don't like ATK headstocks". One is specific, the other is general.
I put mini-clovers on my MusicMan when I replaced the stock tuners; clearly I agree that they fit better!I went looking for fender-style headstocks with mini clovers and couldn't find any
I never considered a G&L based on their Headstock.
But now their CLF Research Series is on the Table [tuners don't bother me]
View attachment 4645307
Got some pics you wanna share?I put mini-clovers on my MusicMan when I replaced the stock tuners; clearly I agree that they fit better!
There's no algorithm here. TB has actual human staff that moderate the forumI know there's a difference between saying your Ibanez is u**y and saying your mother is. But Try telling an algorithm that.