• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

A Question of Aesthetics

Yours is the 1964-65 Cougar made by Crucianelli. Here is the 1966-67 Eko-made version:

View attachment 4645067
Oh, I have neither, but.......

1322277979335.jpg
 
In this thread, I hope to discuss things on a strictly visual level. It's not about what feels good to play or what things sound like. Strictly eye candy, dig?

The thing that made me start thinking about this is the giant tuners on my new bass. They're full size fender-style clovers, and I think they look ridiculous... Like clown shoes on tiny feet.

I went looking for fender-style headstocks with mini clovers and couldn't find any, which got me wondering about how it would look and why we don't see this often. On square(ish) headstocks, like the Gibson LP Jr for example, they're readily found but not so much on other shapes. What's up with that?

The next item on my list is chrome knurled knobs. Honestly, I think they're terribly ugly and they stick out in a weird way. Black ones are much nicer on my eyes and usually match the pickups and pickguard (if there is one) much better.

Finally, a white nut on an otherwise all black bass as well as its opposite. Both just bug me. It breaks the flow of the colour scheme. I suppose some ppl want it for that very reason but it's not for me.

So. Thoughts? Opinions? What are your aesthetic bugaboos, and why?

I've turned down several basses, not because of the way the play or sound, but because of the way they look.

One "look" I can't abide is a beautiful top interrupted by a lengthwise skunk stripe on so-called neck-through basses. Another is gold hardware.

To each their own. ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fishtude
I think there's a difference between saying "your ATK is ugly" and "I don't like ATK headstocks". One is specific, the other is general.
I used the ATK example because of your avatar RR. I'd love one, they just never show up locally when I have any spare cash.
No offense taken at any point, just to be perfectly clear :thumbsup: I mail ordered mine as a teenager when they first came out in the decidedly dressed-down mid-'90s, and I was way too serious to get hung up on appearances, man :meh: so I ordered that bass even though I didn't care for the looks (almost because I didn't) at the time because I thought the features sounded promising. After growing up a bit, I admitted to myself that looks do in fact matter to me and tried going in a few different directions with gear; and now that the dust has settled, guess what? My preferences have landed almost exactly where they started: P/Js, ATKs, and old Peaveys :rolleyes: Teenage me got a lot of things right!

In related aesthetic matters, my 4-string bass back then was a blacked-out Jackson Concert EX Professional. I traded it well for what still remains my favorite guitar, so I don't regret it; but I have kind of kept an eye out for another one, and that exact model has become one of those vanished '90s basses—in the rare instance one does surface, invariably it's dark blue with black hardware and pickups :banghead:
 
I would say function trumps form, except I did go to art school for 4 years. So I can't ignore the cosmetics completely. (Matter of fact, I have a couple of basses I might have sold by now but I just like the way they look on my wall.)
Ugly headstock shapes repel me. Ugly pickguard shapes, too. I won't name names because my least favorite is almost certainly someone else's most favorite.
 
One "look" I can't abide is a beautiful top interrupted by a lengthwise skunk stripe on so-called neck-through basses.
While I generally like the hippie sammich just fine on actual neck-through instruments, I can't stand hippie sammich in the front with bolts in the back. It just seems like a lie :laugh:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fishtude
That made me laugh. I love their basses, but some of the designs leave me shaking my head, especially some of the COTM jobs. It would be interesting see the reaction if you described them like this on the Alembic forum.

Yeah, somehow I don't think I'd be greeted warmly by that bunch if I went in talking about "moldy amoebas" lolol. That said, and I forgot to mention this in my original reply... there are exceptions to everything I like and don't. For instance, I own several natural-finish basses and basses with rosewood necks. I'd even consider an Alembic like this one:

download (43).jpeg


And I absolutely love these Alphers:

A69202F2-8964-4452-B2DF-6BEAB529589F-1024x1024.jpg


1C8238FD-D561-48C8-919D-8E5EE791310B-1024x1024.jpg


284E1EA2-7314-41FB-ACB9-986A121505AF-1024x1024.jpg


FEBB6287-D9B9-4698-B485-4E3856433E66-1024x1024.jpg


Why? Because I'm an absolute sucker for green, teal, and purple basses. It's all a trade off, you see. Except tort. I never trade off with tort. (Haha j/k.)

Not only that, tastes evolve. I may be all about color today, but 20 years ago I would only buy black basses.

I think for the reasons I mentioned in my previous post; tradition. I can imagine the reaction by some if it were, say, pink. Seriously, even if it were red to match a particular aesthetic for that bass, some would be upset.

That reminded me of a quote from my line of work: "100 years of tradition, unimpeded by progress." :laugh:
 
Last edited:
Yeah, somehow I don't think I'd be greeted warmly by that bunch if I went in talking about "moldy amoebas"
You'd probably be OK if you were an owner, otherwise I think, they'd think you were just being insulting.

I think paisley looks like amoebas too and I have a Tele guitar that I want to build that;s gonna be pink paisley similar in tone to my avatar.

I'd even consider an Alembic like this one:
Not me I'm afraid. I've never seen one with a butt cut I like yet. Plus it move the bridge too far to the fretting hand side making first position a longer reach.

And I absolutely love these Alphers
They're beautiful.

I never trade off with tort.
It's never OK to go tort (thinking of a line from Clerks II). We will have to stage an intervention if you do.

That reminded me of a quote from my line of work: "100 years of tradition, unimpeded by progress."
Reminds me of just about every job I've ever had where the shiny bums get to call the shots and not the engineering staff.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fishtude and 2112

Latest posts