Any particular reason why?
Good question, I just didnt like the feel of it. I dont know if that makes sense..Also, I feel like the tone was predominantly mid rangey...
Im not a Carvin hater though... They are quality instruments!
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Any particular reason why?
Percentage-wise though, I think there are a LOT less Icons out there.
I don't know the answer either, but I've just noticed a lot of Icons for sale because I've been curious about them.
Ooh, I been really wanting a BX500 and you just solidified that for me, lol. I had also read things online that the tube didn't do very much but you say it does make a difference, maybe they were referring to other hybrids they've heard but if you say it sounds slightly overdriven that makes me even more gaseus for this head, lol, tax refund here we come. I'd like the sb5000 but with so many J-clones out there that sound just as good and better I cant get past the uglyness.
Well, ugly is subjective, but check out Darryl Williams' bass, on the right.
Invalid Link Removed
It doesn't look so much like a J clone, and it sure ain 't ugly.
Is that blue or green or both or what?![]()
The finish is quite beautiful but the shape of the bass is downright ugly, IMO.
To each his own for sure, but I think the SBs are really sweet looking basses. Clearly a nice departure from yet another snoring jazz bass clone, Carvin appears to have an original looking classic here.
I know that many folks on line don't get a chance to play / hear Carvin gear before they consider buying, so since I was up at the Poway store Saturday, I thought I'd share my 1st hand view of what I played / heard
SB5000
The one I played was sunburst top, rosewood fretboard, swamp ash body - nothing particularly fancy. Fit/finish was excellent, setup was good. I played it through both a BX500 2x10 and 1x15 combo.
The neck was thinner than I had expected (I had read on line to expect chunkyness). It had what felt like a bit of neck dive - not the easiest bass to play sitting down... But once I started playing, I was impressed. It was as nice as *any* 5 string J I have ever played, and *much* nicer than any Fender 5 I've tried. Nice even action, nice warm tone - and it slaps all day. I was *impressed*. This bass isn't hype - it's legit. After noodling on it for a while, I decided to try its 4 string cousin...
Icon 4 fretted:
Another lovely looking bass - Really, the Icon's are the first Carvin basses they have made that I thought were pleasing to the eye... Anyway, the bass played better, but still sounded gutless. I don't know what it was. I was running through the same BX500 combo that I ran the SB5000 through, the there was no comparison. The SB5000 sounded *pro* - these sounded... well, not very good.
Lastly, the amp:
BX500:
I have read a fair amount of buzz on this head, so I had to really take a good look.
That's it. I guess my quest for the Perfect Fretless will go unresolved for another day...
You were looking at the Icon? Yeah, I can't suggest it. But he SB5000 was something nice...