TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Does that qualify as active?Wasn't there an earlier bass with a built in "fuzz" circuit?
Does that qualify as active?
If the battery was required to get any sound out of it I'd call it active. If the battery was only required to use the fuzz circuit, i wouldn't call it an active bass. That's misleading.I believe the Hofner 500/8-BZ had a built in fuzz the required an on-board battery (if someone knows different, please correct me).
How do you want to define "active"? I've always thought the term referred to an on-board, tone-altering circuit which requires a power source. I'm no authority (all my basses are passive) so straighten me out if that's wrong.
I keep all that stuff on the pedal board run by a Strymon power block because I hate missing with batteries.
I love Alembic basses and have 2. But I think Les Paul had bass with active electronics; in the Les Paul Recording Bass, made prior to Alembic. However Alembic was the first to get them out there, and did it right. The Les Paul was made in 1969. Alembic #1 was 1972. I hope I am right here.
The Les Paul Bass and Triumph bass had low impedance electronics but I'm not sure they were powered i.e. active... I'm sure @Basvarken would know.
But I think Les Paul had bass with active electronics; in the Les Paul Recording Bass, made prior to Alembic.
I don't see how a built in fuzz counts as active.
Thanks, I wasn't aware of that.The Hofner is a bass preamp: Hofner Active Guitar Electronics - Fact File (link copied from @brianrost )
I could post a troll post but I won't.So which maker was the last to offer active elecs?
Or, who still doesn't offer actives, even today?