TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I'm interested in hearing from those who switched from 4 to 5 (or 6) but then decided to go back to strictly 4.
I've been a 4-stringer for 35 years (fretted and fretless), and for several years I've thought that I should make the switch to 5, for reasons of extended range and because I thought I might make worthwhile gains as a player - more options to play different kinds of patterns and add to the sonic palette, etc.
So in the last year I've bought/sold/traded several fivers, recently settling on a Lakland 55-02. Great bass - feel and tonal range are ideal for me. I initially tried stringing from E to C - it felt okay and nice for upper-end soloing and chording, etc. Then I switched to B to G, because that was the standard that seemed to be so popular and so useful to so many bassists. Feels okay, I like being able to play some low notes high on the B string, but I don't feel like I have much use for anything lower than the D. I've done a sit-in with it, but not yet a reading gig.
I pulled out my Marcus Miller Jazz last night, played on it a long while and it felt like going home. Also felt like I wasn't really missing that much by NOT having the extra low string (or high string). Part of that feeling, I know, is natural, since I played only 4-string all those years.
So you think I just need more time on the 5 for it to feel natural, like "home"?
For those who've returned to 4 - do you have regrets about not staying with 5 or 6? Do you find yourself in situations where you feel like the music would REALLY benefit from having those extra low or high notes (metal or punk wouldn't apply to me, but I have and probably will play about every other kind of music).
Just wondering what people are thinking about this.
Thanks for the thoughts/feedback.
I'm inclined to go on back to 4 exclusively, but for a coupla reasons: 1)I have the feeling that I just haven't given it enough time to get fully comfortable, and 2)I might find those lower notes useful for jamband and reggae (or reggae-ish) settings.
So you think I just need more time on the 5 for it to feel natural, like "home"?
For me, it took being in a band that required the extra range before I came around and adapted. Just like with my Rickenbackers, boy am I glad I did.
Curious - what kind of band required the extra range? And did that come from you, feeling like you needed the extra range, or from band members?
It came from a desire to be faithful to the original.
Playing classic rock originals and covers never required anything below Eb for me. For decades.
Now I'm in a band that plays a greater range, and I find myself needing the low notes on the B much more often. "Love Sneakin' Up On You" (Bonnie Raitt) and "Save A Horse" (Big & Rich) are the most recent additions to my 5-string repertoire.
if i need 7 or 9 + strings i will probably get a piano![]()

Never played a sixer but the low B on the fivers always sounding too mushy and all rumble regardless of amp and or cabs. If I wanted all that the rumble I'd just add a few subs to my rig.
Which only shows that you never paid enough for your basses. It also shows you haven't a clue how to play a 5+ string bass.
How much should I pay for a 5 stringer to get a non-mushy low B?
Does a $1500 dollar fernades not count as a good enough bass?
Do I have to spend 5k on a custom boutique bass to get a well defined Low B?
And how exactly does one get a "clue"? Ya know, so I can play a fiver right?
I never said fivers suck; I said I could never get a well defined Low B sound that I liked.
How does my subjective opinion have any bearing on any of those things?