Unrepresented
Something Borderline Offensive
True...but you would have UPS and Fed-X, plus others, on the other side of the fence in Washington.
That's my point. This is not the first legislation that will be lobbied at the FAA.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
True...but you would have UPS and Fed-X, plus others, on the other side of the fence in Washington.
First - Amazon is not in the 'stuff' business - they are in the content-delivery business. They sell their spiffy Kindles at a loss because they facilitate the delivery of content.True...but you would have UPS and Fed-X, plus others, on the other side of the fence in Washington.
These dreams have been popping up since industrialists and innovators have found a communication medium.
It's nonsense and the media is trumpeting it to the hilt. Guess it's a slow news week.
Lol, you serious?
I was thinking the same thing. What prevents someone from grabbing the thing before it takes off and keeping it? I'm sure there's a gps but someone could probably take that out real quick and then they have their own drone. They're not gonna know you took it. Who's to say a gang of rabble rousing youths didn't run up and grab it
Also, Trees, electrical/telephone cables, antennae, and other miscellaneous hazards might present a problem for these drones.
You sound like my father, bah humbugging everything. There is a reason that the innovator in question, had the vision to found Amazon and you and I are posting on Talkbass. Perhaps the concept is before its time, but there is nothing nonsense about it. Some people do, while others are eternal pessimists.
It's not feasible or efficient in real world scenarios. That doesn't make me pessimistic - it makes me realistic.
I could hash up the endless number of ideas that business people have had for generations but it would take a book to cover them all.
It's not feasible or efficient in real world scenarios. That doesn't make me pessimistic - it makes me realistic. Time won't make any difference. We'll be holographically transporting items before this is a reasonable alternative, IMO.
Pffttt....you probably think the space elevator is a bad idea too.
-Mike
Funny chit right thereYou get to fill out a nasty 'packaging review' on the Amazon Prime site...
It's not feasible or efficient in real world scenarios. .
Says you. People in the late 60's thought the idea of a personal communicator from Star Trek was ridiculous too.
They also figured we'd have colonized Mars, had household robots to serve us, and lest ye forget, jet packs!
I would like to think that ultimately everything comes largely down to budget issues.Mars: More budgetary than technical, especially once you factor in "Why, exactly?" Hubble telescope (big specialized robot) doing deep-space imaging from Earth orbit pretty well...
Household robots: Had a Roomba for a while - not ready for prime time. Navigating back to the charger is cool; emptying its own bin is essential - not there yet. I've seen Asimo do some pretty amazing things - still creepy tho... And back to energy density issues, which is why electric cars are still in their infancy (again).
Jet Packs: And now we're back to private navigation in controlled airspace again ;-)
I worked in AI for a while, supporting expert systems. Most people who saw them - and they did really cool stuff - were severely underwhelmed. They were expecting HAL.
Drones...not for awhile, and by then I'll have a high powered hose nozzle to test out. Oops, was just splashing my kids and I accidentally...
Invalid Link Removed