I have learned about more new gear and more new music on this thread than any other on TB.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I have learned about more new gear and more new music on this thread than any other on TB.
I've gravitated towards the term "comprovisation" both because so much of the improv-based music I make and listen to is as much composition-based as it is improv-based, but also to disassociate it from the more traditional Jazz [sic] improvisation. The stuff that (I guess) I would consider "post-jazz" has a decidedly more European connection than an African-American connection; its lineage doesn't seem to follow the traditional historical arc of American Jazz (blues to ragtime to swing to blah-blah-blah), but rather imagines a jagged timeline that connects 20th Century modernist approaches to extemporization and experimental Situation/Process compositions and then intersects Jazz right around the time Ornette Coleman and Albert Ayler et al were casting off the yoke of "The Changes" (scare-quotes intentional). So yes, Jazz can be a jumping-off place...but sometimes it's a jumping-on place, and you've leapt to it by way of the Darmstadt School. Or via Harry Partch. Or Pink Floyd.
Gotta check this later.
This guy is quickly becoming a favorite resource.
All my favorite bands I’ve been in have some sort of improv elements. Sometimes fairly structured bands even, leave room to change up the feel or dynamics. It’s the closest thing to a ‘spiritual’ connection to me when someone instigates something different and everyone reacts to it well. It’s a beautiful thing. I haven’t been in a pure, wholly improvised group in a long time, but it’s really fun to go off the rails even in fairly conventional musicI always loved CAN's "spontaneous composition" to describe a lot of what they did. And that seemed to be happening in Miles Davis's stuff in that late 60s/early 70s era. And Frank Zappa had his own twisted take on improvisation/composition. King Crimson too - they were one of the few classic "prog" bands that incorporated improvisation. Oh yeah, the Grateful Dead. I think all of these influenced me as an improvisor, though I didn't realize it until much later in my life...
Gotta check this later.
This guy is quickly becoming a favorite resource.
Wow, I'm behind on the thread today.....
Got some catching up to do.
Genres/labels..... euh......that's exactly like talking about sex. It always falls short of the real thing.
Or something like that....
![]()
Touché.depends who’s doing the talking. (?)
![]()
Sveinung Hovensjø with Terje Rypdal also played a bass vi
No jest. There's no dad-band/1987 was the high water mark for rock/what P-bass should I buy? people in here. It's working.the thread title is probably what it is, it's not perfectly in tune with what happens here, but it keeps the riff-raff out (i JEST)
The bridge is the excuse I keep using to avoid getting a Bass VI. I have a Squier Jaguar guitar with that kind of bridge on it, and it goes out of tune as soon as you look at it. As far as I can tell the Squier VI's also don't lock. One day I was in GC and they had a higher end Fender Jaguar with a locking version of the bridge and it was sweet to play. A vibrato bridge is of limited usefulness to me in any case, especially on a bass; but they are a part of the classic VI setup. If I ever get one I'd have to get a locking replacement immediately methinks.
Eastwood does make a couple of cool VI's but the bridges don't look much better.
No jest. There's no dad-band/1987 was the high water mark for rock/what P-bass should I buy? people in here. It's working.
dad-band