• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Ampeg SVT-7 Pro TEST

I'm going to repost Jerrold's post in the other thread that just got closed again just so we have it here:

"I DID get a short look at the 7 PRO schematic a while back....... NO B&O module...... In fact, the unit I know about that is closest to the 7PRO power amp topology is the old Ampeg PB 250, the first Ampeg Class-D unit. Really pretty close, although we used a different limiter system in the PB250.

"IIRC the 7PRO has, in the "C" version, a supply-voltage-responsive clip limiter. I think they had an opto in earlier versions. If my recollection is correct, the "cut-out" issues might be related to that....it can be tricky to get those limiters to work just right. And if you don't, you can get "issues" with long pulse lengths and other stuff that would cause a cut-out in a class-D amp, as has been reported in "some" units..... "some" maybe being the ones with the wrong ratio of resistor values due to tolerances.

"And most overcurrent limiters have some form of time-delay on them.... if you get a long pulse from the modulator, the output current in the pulse can get too high and trip the overcurrent detector. Then you wait for whatever time is inherent in the overcurrent shutdown circuit before output resumes.

"I'm not going to get into the really gory details of the design, I don't want to, and would have to go back and get another look at the schematic. And, I don't "give away Loud's store", it's theirs, not mine.

"I was told, however, that the 7PRO is a Loud China design, under the direction of the guy (Jonathan Chen) who ran that operation and apparently has since left. I am not so sure that the US Loud engineering folks themselves are so delighted with all the details of it..... maybe yes, maybe no, I have heard various noises about THAT, and it doesn't matter anyway.

"I didn't see any reason why the unit wouldn't put out the full 1000 watts, unless something about the SMPS was limiting the power, which, depending on line voltage, is quite possible. I do not think the main voltages were regulated in any way by the SMPS, which means it can drop under load or with line voltage.

"I would assume BGM knows how to deal with mains voltage, etc.

"Burst mode power, or whatever you call it, is not new, QSC happily uses it.....And before them, even Crown quoted it in their specs (in addition to "real" specs). IIRC, the PLX amps are rated to 2 ohms, but you don't dare run them at 2 full power in test for long. There was, I believe, a note that tests should be no longer than 3 or 5 seconds, since a blocking capacitor in the SMPS would die a horrible death if the test were carried longer. QSC has a good rep, though.

"And, the automated test gear is nice, and good, and gives a lot of info. There can be a place for the old school plain oscillator and THD analyzer, though..... it lets you do a 'survey" so much faster, adjusting on the fly to whatever the odd thing under test ends up doing.

"I am sure the BGM folks know how to run their extra-cool stuff... I'm just sayin........."
 
Except that using the example of pro power amps in the near-2Kwatt and up range as an example of specs accuracy for amps well below that output doesn't really apply. Amps like the higher-powered examples in the QSC PLX series can be rated in continuous ("RMS") terms at a very low THD until you get to the point that the incoming AC service is the limiting factor. At that point then you need to begin to talk of musical signal duty cycles like 1/8 and 1/3, or specifcy "burst" durations to denote that for short periods they can make huge huge power... But for longer periods these amps still have only as high of a continuous rating as the wall and the conversion efficiency of their amp class (AB, D, etc) allows.

This should not to be confused with a sane specs approach for amps that don't fall into that near-2Kwatt category.
 
I'm going to repost Jerrold's post in the other thread that just got closed again just so we have it here:

"I DID get a short look at the 7 PRO schematic a while back....... NO B&O module...... In fact, the unit I know about that is closest to the 7PRO power amp topology is the old Ampeg PB 250, the first Ampeg Class-D unit. Really pretty close, although we used a different limiter system in the PB250.

"IIRC the 7PRO has, in the "C" version, a supply-voltage-responsive clip limiter. I think they had an opto in earlier versions. If my recollection is correct, the "cut-out" issues might be related to that....it can be tricky to get those limiters to work just right. And if you don't, you can get "issues" with long pulse lengths and other stuff that would cause a cut-out in a class-D amp, as has been reported in "some" units..... "some" maybe being the ones with the wrong ratio of resistor values due to tolerances.

"And most overcurrent limiters have some form of time-delay on them.... if you get a long pulse from the modulator, the output current in the pulse can get too high and trip the overcurrent detector. Then you wait for whatever time is inherent in the overcurrent shutdown circuit before output resumes.

"I'm not going to get into the really gory details of the design, I don't want to, and would have to go back and get another look at the schematic. And, I don't "give away Loud's store", it's theirs, not mine.

"I was told, however, that the 7PRO is a Loud China design, under the direction of the guy (Jonathan Chen) who ran that operation and apparently has since left. I am not so sure that the US Loud engineering folks themselves are so delighted with all the details of it..... maybe yes, maybe no, I have heard various noises about THAT, and it doesn't matter anyway.

"I didn't see any reason why the unit wouldn't put out the full 1000 watts, unless something about the SMPS was limiting the power, which, depending on line voltage, is quite possible. I do not think the main voltages were regulated in any way by the SMPS, which means it can drop under load or with line voltage.

"I would assume BGM knows how to deal with mains voltage, etc.

"Burst mode power, or whatever you call it, is not new, QSC happily uses it.....And before them, even Crown quoted it in their specs (in addition to "real" specs). IIRC, the PLX amps are rated to 2 ohms, but you don't dare run them at 2 full power in test for long. There was, I believe, a note that tests should be no longer than 3 or 5 seconds, since a blocking capacitor in the SMPS would die a horrible death if the test were carried longer. QSC has a good rep, though.

"And, the automated test gear is nice, and good, and gives a lot of info. There can be a place for the old school plain oscillator and THD analyzer, though..... it lets you do a 'survey" so much faster, adjusting on the fly to whatever the odd thing under test ends up doing.

"I am sure the BGM folks know how to run their extra-cool stuff... I'm just sayin........."


Thanks for catching that.

Without too much public discussion of mod issues, I was fortunate enough to be refreshing the screen a couple times and saw what happened over there. All I'll say is, if that's the kind of stuff they need to keep cleaning up behind the scenes, it needed to end, immediately.

Here's to keeping this one civil.
 
I would really like to see testing to a standard, FTC, or EIA or both.

If, for example you look at how QSC publishes their specs they do Both, where applicable.

PLX2502
----------
8 ohms
FTC 20 Hz - 20 kHz 0.05% THD 425 W
EIA 1 kHz 0.1% THD 450 W
4 ohms
FTC 20 Hz - 20 kHz 0.05% THD 675 W
EIA 1 kHz 0.1% THD 750 W
2 ohms
EIA 1 kHz 1% THD 1250 W

And they even mention current draw from the wall outlet.

CURRENT CONSUMPTION
1/8 Power (pink noise)
8 ohms 5A/120V
4 ohms 7.5A / 120V
2 ohms 11.2A / 120V

1/3 Power (pink noise)
8 ohms 8.2A/120V
4 ohms 12.6A / 120V
2 ohms 19A / 120V

Full Power
8 ohms 15.5A/120V
4 ohms 25A / 120V
2 ohms 37A / 120V

Notes Long term, active-limited to 30A/120V

Non QSC Amplifiers stating they have multi-KW are suspect to me. YMMV, IMHO, ...
Seriously, when you get into multi KW and stage outlets just can't supply the current to power amplifiers at full power. Where is a bass player going to get 30A on stage?
 
I would really like to see testing to a standard, FTC, or EIA or both.

If, for example you look at how QSC publishes their specs they do Both, where applicable.

PLX2502
----------
8 ohms
FTC 20 Hz - 20 kHz 0.05% THD 425 W
EIA 1 kHz 0.1% THD 450 W
4 ohms
FTC 20 Hz - 20 kHz 0.05% THD 675 W
EIA 1 kHz 0.1% THD 750 W
2 ohms
EIA 1 kHz 1% THD 1250 W

And they even mention current draw from the wall outlet.

CURRENT CONSUMPTION
1/8 Power (pink noise)
8 ohms 5A/120V
4 ohms 7.5A / 120V
2 ohms 11.2A / 120V

1/3 Power (pink noise)
8 ohms 8.2A/120V
4 ohms 12.6A / 120V
2 ohms 19A / 120V

Full Power
8 ohms 15.5A/120V
4 ohms 25A / 120V
2 ohms 37A / 120V

Notes Long term, active-limited to 30A/120V

Non QSC Amplifiers stating they have multi-KW are suspect to me. YMMV, IMHO, ...
Seriously, when you get into multi KW and stage outlets just can't supply the current to power amplifiers at full power. Where is a bass player going to get 30A on stage?

Those amps aren't for people running a bass amp at a bar.

As to non-QSC amps, in my experience the people who actually use such things, and understand how you power them, tend to most often prefer Crown; with some people holding out for the Crest stuff.
 
Except that using the example of pro power amps in the near-2Kwatt and up range as an example of specs accuracy for amps well below that output doesn't really apply. Amps like the higher-powered examples in the QSC PLX series can be rated in continuous ("RMS") terms at a very low THD until you get to the point that the incoming AC service is the limiting factor. At that point then you need to begin to talk of musical signal duty cycles like 1/8 and 1/3, or specifcy "burst" durations to denote that for short periods they can make huge huge power... But for longer periods these amps still have only as high of a continuous rating as the wall and the conversion efficiency of their amp class (AB, D, etc) allows.

This should not to be confused with a sane specs approach for amps that don't fall into that near-2Kwatt category.


This is a good point. Hartley Peavey does a good layman's explanation of this in one of his papers using a toilet analogy of all things. Ratings are different when you get to levels above what a wall socket can continuously deliver, but an amp can produce more power than the wall socket can deliver. At lower power like this one, it's pretty much moot.

Chapter 4 of the white papers. Invalid Link Removed
 
I put a 20 amp circuit in my basement which is normally around 124 V. When I crank my bridged CA9 into my Berg NV's to the point of clipping, the wall voltage will dip down to around 119 or 120, and that's with nothing else on the circuit!
 
I've seen home wall voltages ranging from ~95V up to about ~135V on nominally 120V lines.

Something is amiss for sure there. The place I live in is 100 years old and has had several "homebrew/brother-in-law" type wiring done over the years and I still get a fairly consistent 117-119 most places. Although, the thing is so branched off/effed up I've never been able to do a proper circuit trace/load calc. I just know I can't use the microwave when a certain window A/C unit it running 3 rooms away or a good portion of the house goes dark. I have managed to insure everything is grounded though and no hots/neutrals are reversed.:p
 
All I know is that my 7pro sounds sick awesome through my SVT 810E & Loud as hell too. Also changing the 12AX7 tube inside makes a huge difference. I put in a Gold Lion 12AX7 & a old RCA 12AX7 I found in an old radio station out in the country. Each tube made the 7pro sound like a totaly different animal.
 
Not all in one home.

I've seen houses where the 120VAC is 95-100V, and I've seen houses where the 120VAC is 130-135V.

...and yes, something is definitely amiss in those situations, and if you complain enough the power company will often fix it.

Ya, that has to be a problem further up the line. I take care of a small handful of rental places here as an occasional side job. I think the lowest I've seen may be 114, the highest, 123-124.
 
Doesn't matter.

A bass amp shouldn't require lab precision power regulation to function at better than 75% of it's spec.

Being robust and usable under a wide variety of real world conditions is part of what makes something a quality amp.

+1

The reason I think so-called "power conditioners" like the Furman are such a sham. It provides some convenience and some lights...."condition power", is does not....nor does said power need to be "conditioned".
 
You'd think that would be fine as the voltage would double/halve with the switch. More interesting is a 240V scenario in Australia, which aparently can spike to 270.

If an amps output varies so widely with small variations in line voltage, surely this would call into question the usefulness of testing and publishing such a specific rating in the first place. I haven't read the review in detail but I assume line voltage for the BGM test is accurately regulated.

Tom - do you guys test a range of voltages to see how the amp performs or do you just set it to 110V and run that?