Oh dang, I always thought they were more similar to the he than hlf. Never mind on my request then 
Enjoy the benefits of a premium membership!
Upgrade Account
-
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Old thread..
But my short experience with a passive cheap jazz bass and an SVT-300 tube amp and the 610-HLF was that is was a bit muddy with all controls set at noon on the amp (midrange selector on 3) not pushing the volume to much..
The major problem was mostly on the F1 and F2 note on the E and A string.. F2 was worst (87.3Hz),, The F1 was probably due to the second harmonic (F2) on that F played on the low E string. It was not a large room the gear was in so it could be room related.. But I did not have a multiscale EQ to verify if this was the case as that frequency can not be dialed out with the amps EQ..
But my short experience with a passive cheap jazz bass and an SVT-300 tube amp and the 610-HLF was that is was a bit muddy with all controls set at noon on the amp (midrange selector on 3) not pushing the volume to much..
The major problem was mostly on the F1 and F2 note on the E and A string.. F2 was worst (87.3Hz),, The F1 was probably due to the second harmonic (F2) on that F played on the low E string. It was not a large room the gear was in so it could be room related.. But I did not have a multiscale EQ to verify if this was the case as that frequency can not be dialed out with the amps EQ..
You are probably right.
It was a fairly small room so maybe some kind of funky resonance of that room that gets amplified excessively..
Still loving my 610HLF. I've gigged with it quite a bit now and I love the tone I get. Sure it's not exactly fun getting into my vehicle but getting it out and wheeling it around is pretty easy and actually better than the 410 I had before.
