• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Double Bass Amps: Carvin vs Mesa Boogie vs Acoustic Image

Need help. Appreciate all your input.

For my NS Design base I am considering:
- Carvin 515N
- Mesa Boogie Walkabout Scout
- Acoustic Image Contra

Question:
- Carvin (new amp) has semi-parametric mid sweep tone controls PLUS contour adjustment PLUS 9 channel graphic EQ. Is this redundant or can you really make a difference with all these controls

I'll be playing the bass at home and in small venues.

Thanks all
 
The Mesa Boogie has more "Tube" character/coloration and a punchier midrange voicing than the AI will have. It has an all tube preamp which is pretty fat for electric bass. The semi-parametric eq is really absurdly powerful for cutting or boosting specific frequencys. I rarely use the Mesa parametric eq, if you have a great sound going in, and you like the voicing of the amp there is not a huge need for it. You can get a really hot saturated sound though by cranking the input gain. I selling my Mesa Heas because don't like using it for upright anymore. I am going for a cleaner, Acoustic Image sound but the Mesa's sound may work well for the NS. Hope that that helps.
 
Question:
- Carvin (new amp) has semi-parametric mid sweep tone controls PLUS contour adjustment PLUS 9 channel graphic EQ. Is this redundant or can you really make a difference with all these controls

I'm a fairly recent convert to the Carvin world (for this discussion, I'm referring to my 510N combo) and can say that having all of those controls is actually quite nice. Contour is useful for dialing out some mids in a general fashion and the sweep controls give you the ability to further tweak your sound. I tend to lightly touch all of those controls and use the eq for finding the sweet spot of each room.
 

Latest posts