I'd like to ask your opinion (and perhaps experiences) about the following matter. This is a tricky situation and it bothers me a lot at the moment.
I have been playing bass in a punk band for almost two years now. I replaced the former bassist who moved abroad.
I have practiced a lot, spent quite a lot of money and been very much involved to all things concerning the band. We are approaching our biggest gig yet in a very high-profile club, and we all have been very exited and making a lot of plans.
I don't want to sound like some arrogant Ms. Know-It-All, but I have the best knowledge in music in our band. I've been practicing music since I was a child and kept it going to my adulthood. I studied guitar, music theory and orchestration in a music school for several years and then had a private teacher. My band members all played some instruments for few years as children, but then quitted in their pre-teens.
But few days ago it hit me. I couldn't take part to the last rehearsal due to an important family event and afterwards I heard that they had decided to invite the original bassist from abroad to play with us in the gig! Their idea is to have two bass players on stage. I think it sounds cute for them being sort of "loyal" to their old bassist etc.
But...
I have to say I am a bit frustrated since I've practised so hard, and I'm even investing to a new bass before the gig.
It feels like I've done all the work and suddenly someone else comes and eats the whole cake for me. It feels like that even though they said there will be two bass players. I can't help it.
But what do you think? Is it a good idea to have two bassists in a punk band? We play melodic punk. I think that there just aren't enough elements in our music to have two bassists playing it. I'm afraid that the lower section will sound too fatty. I'm originally a guitarist and a saxophonist, and because of the latter I'm very familiar with improvising. But when I've tried to use some variation in my playing (in other words , playing other than roots) the other members disallow me to do this and want me to play exactly the sounds that the guitar is playing (we only have a rhythm guitarist). I think this is exremely ridiculous, since it kind of waters down the meaning of the bass in the band. I've tried to explain all this, but they think I'm wrong and should just listen to them because they form the majority with their opinions. They just want to be "safe" all the time without wanting to take risks with trying out new things.
I'd like to have some advice from some more experienced band players. How do you handle situations like this? I don't want to lose my band, but find it very hard to go on when we cannot discuss or they don't ever give value to my opinions, even when they concern myself.
I have been playing bass in a punk band for almost two years now. I replaced the former bassist who moved abroad.
I have practiced a lot, spent quite a lot of money and been very much involved to all things concerning the band. We are approaching our biggest gig yet in a very high-profile club, and we all have been very exited and making a lot of plans.
I don't want to sound like some arrogant Ms. Know-It-All, but I have the best knowledge in music in our band. I've been practicing music since I was a child and kept it going to my adulthood. I studied guitar, music theory and orchestration in a music school for several years and then had a private teacher. My band members all played some instruments for few years as children, but then quitted in their pre-teens.
But few days ago it hit me. I couldn't take part to the last rehearsal due to an important family event and afterwards I heard that they had decided to invite the original bassist from abroad to play with us in the gig! Their idea is to have two bass players on stage. I think it sounds cute for them being sort of "loyal" to their old bassist etc.
But...
I have to say I am a bit frustrated since I've practised so hard, and I'm even investing to a new bass before the gig.
It feels like I've done all the work and suddenly someone else comes and eats the whole cake for me. It feels like that even though they said there will be two bass players. I can't help it.
But what do you think? Is it a good idea to have two bassists in a punk band? We play melodic punk. I think that there just aren't enough elements in our music to have two bassists playing it. I'm afraid that the lower section will sound too fatty. I'm originally a guitarist and a saxophonist, and because of the latter I'm very familiar with improvising. But when I've tried to use some variation in my playing (in other words , playing other than roots) the other members disallow me to do this and want me to play exactly the sounds that the guitar is playing (we only have a rhythm guitarist). I think this is exremely ridiculous, since it kind of waters down the meaning of the bass in the band. I've tried to explain all this, but they think I'm wrong and should just listen to them because they form the majority with their opinions. They just want to be "safe" all the time without wanting to take risks with trying out new things.
I'd like to have some advice from some more experienced band players. How do you handle situations like this? I don't want to lose my band, but find it very hard to go on when we cannot discuss or they don't ever give value to my opinions, even when they concern myself.