• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Another Amp Poll with a Difference

If you had only one choice which Amp would you take if money was no consideration ?


  • Total voters
    142
I actually haven't tried out a Sadowsky at all. But I voted for it because I greatly favor all-tube amps and that was the only one listed. But if I'm being totally honest, I don't greatly favor having to move all-tube amps, so I'd probably go for the Woods because it's the lightest ;)
 
I've played or owned all of these....LMII all the way!

It's kind of a silly poll, since these amps sound quite different from one another. Without including tone goals, playing style, volume need, etc., the comparison is reasonably silly (e.g., the Sadowsky SA200 is a fine tube amp, but doesn't fit my tone goals, etc.).

That being said, for a warm, 'middle of the road', reasonably loud, reasonably transparent amplification system, I have never heard anything better than the LMII!
 
Haven't tried 'em all but after reading about them from tests and TB, i choose the SA200. Seems to me that the others are more clean "fusionfriendly" toneoriented. And yes i know that Bisonette uses Markbass and Flea GK. Please don't flame me! Where's the SVT, DB750 and 400+ just to name a few? It seems to me that, aside from the Sadowsky, these amps were chosen based on weight!
But i always like any poll with the moniker "if money was no consideration". That's how i live my life (just don't tell my gf or banklady - oh wait never mind, they know!)
 
If there is one, and only one man, who is likely to have tried them all, I would have to say Tom Bowlus. Where is he?

Sorry, I have been away for a bit (under the weather, but doing okay now).

I'd need two votes. For the 'solid state' side of me, it's the Berg IP cabs (any config), all the way. But for my 'tube side', and even somewhat for my 'SS side', the SA200 is the King. :cool:

Bang for the buck award goes to the LMII, though, for sure.

Tom.
 
A9X, what's the reason you like a separate preamp and power amp so much over a head? Are you one of those guys like Billy Sheehan who fell in love with a preamp they don't make anymore? Or do you like to run lots of giant speakers??
A few reasons. I like not to have a 'brand' sound, which many heads have. You get more watts/$ with Pro PA amps, they're generally better built and more reliable. It's easier to get a change in tone if tastes/needs/wants change enough by getting a new pre. Then there's my strong preference for biamping, which a 2ch pro PA amp facilitates. I'm building a new rig (I like to design and build audio gear) that will be triamped in two boxes. All the power will be in the mid/high box, which can also be used stand alone as a 10+horn super mini combo.
Cheers